Johan Cruyff Institute vs University of Groningen - RUG vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Hanze University of Applied Sciences - UAS
Side-by-side comparison from 218 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Specialized sports management content and expert professors
- +Valuable industry connections and networking opportunities
- +Welcoming atmosphere and excellent staff support
- +High-quality faculty and innovative teaching
- +State-of-the-art facilities and extensive campus amenities
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for self-development
- +Balanced theory/practice with real-world application
- +Diverse and international student community and faculty
- +High-quality, challenging education with expert guest lectures
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, skills-based learning and interconnected subjects
- +Helpful, inspiring teachers and supportive staff
- +International atmosphere and diverse group work opportunities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor quality of instruction and unengaging student discussions.
- -Ineffective project management and lack of professional experience among peers.
- -Lack of support and high failure rates create a negative academic environment.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues contribute to confusion and frustration.
- -Toxic culture and discrimination negatively impact student well-being and integration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant content.
- -Lack of practical application and low teacher commitment.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across several key areas, the institution receives commendable ratings. Its strongest performances are noted in Value and Internationality, both achieving near-perfect scores. Professors also garnered exceptionally high marks. The weakest area is Location, which, while still positive, is rated lower than other aspects. Student Life, Accomodation, and Facilities all fall within a strong middle range.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.21). **Facilities** (4.15) and **Location** (4.07) also receive strong scores. The primary area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating (2.90). **Professors** (3.84) and **Value** (4.02) are rated moderately.
This institution shows a strong performance in key areas, with Internationality (4.26) and Value (4.19) receiving the highest marks. Professors (4.13) also earned a notably positive rating. Student Life (3.98) and Location (3.96) are also well-regarded. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, which received a considerably lower score of 3.11.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and internationality, both scoring above 4.5. Location also received a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area with a score of 3.16. Professor quality and facilities are rated moderately well, while value for money is also a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University students largely praise the insightful sports management content, quality professors, and valuable networking opportunities, with a ~96% positive sentiment. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions issues with academic support variability or program depth.
~72% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and an international atmosphere. ~11% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues with academic support and student care.
~93% of 51 reviews are positive, highlighting good theory-practice balance, knowledgeable lecturers, and program flexibility. No negative feedback was recorded.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers, practical learning, and an international atmosphere. A small portion of feedback (~3%) mentions outdated curriculum and low teacher commitment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
A perfect synergy between theoretical knowledge, practical application, and high-quality networking. After completing the Master in Sport Management at Johan Cruyff Institute, I took a major step forward in my career in the sports industry. What truly sets this institution apart is the closeness and support of the professors and staff, as well as the enriching experiences shared with fellow students. Without a doubt, it has been one of the most transformative decisions of my life.
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
I followed the Marketing & Communications Bachelor at Hanzehogeschool and the course has taught me very little with regards to what is actually required in the marketing field. To start off, 90% of the teachers do lectures as a side job, very low commitment from most of them I spent a full year learning and applying marketing theories that were branded outdated in the 90's and early 2000's. In addition a whole semester was wasted on a theory one of the teachers came up with. The professor who guided my while writing my thesis laughed at the premise of using it. Current and future marketing is mostly based on digital marketing. The """"professor"""" digital marketing knew squat, zero. In the digital marketing field, aspects such as SEO, SEA, Google AdWords etc are vital. This was not taught properly in the curriculum. A fellow student who had a side job working with AdWords stopped showing up, as he claimed the teacher was explaining it wrong. If you want to get into marketing, go somewhere else. Hanze will teach how to do a SWOT analysis (debunked in the 90's) every year you attend and not teach you the skills vital in a new marketing environment. I do not work in marketing or advertising, I feel and know I do not possess the necessary skills from merely reading the job vacancy. I finished the degree to make sure I have a Bachelor standard and not completely waste my time and money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
