Universidad César Vallejo - UCV vs Linnaeus University - LNU vs RMIT University vs University of Peshawar vs Universitas Peradaban
Side-by-side comparison from 151 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and engaging professors
- +Affordable education and abundant opportunities
- +Inclusive and collaborative learning environment
- +Supportive and helpful professors and staff.
- +Good facilities and diverse academic programs.
- +Welcoming international environment and convenient resources.
- +Practical and industry-focused learning
- +Real-world experience from professors
- +Engaging and relevant coursework
- +Beautiful campus and peaceful environment
- +Supportive faculty and comprehensive academic programs
- +Diverse and lively student body
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly concerning international student affairs.
- -Mediocre teaching quality with limited value beyond independent learning.
- -Lack of industry connections and career support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration and lack of support.
- -Industrial action negatively impacts students with delayed feedback and limited staff assistance.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient manual processes.
- -Concerns about the GPA system and perceived favoritism.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution presents a generally positive picture, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.75 and strong marks for **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4.25). Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Other aspects like Facilities, Internationality, and Location fall within the good to very good range.
Academic and student life aspects of the university received high marks. The institution particularly excelled in Internationality (4.27) and Student Life (4.23), reflecting a vibrant and globally-connected campus environment. Facilities (4.16) and Professors (4.12) also garnered positive feedback. Conversely, Value (3.81) and Location (3.83) were the lowest-rated categories, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Accommodations also scored moderately (3.92).
Professors stand out as the university's strongest asset, earning a stellar 4.477 rating. Facilities and Value also received favorable scores above 4.2. The lowest-rated aspect, however, is Accommodation, coming in at 3.886. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid reputation, particularly in its academic and financial offerings.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, which received the highest rating. Conversely, **internationality** stands out as the area with the lowest score. Other assessed aspects, including professors, student life, and value, received generally positive feedback, while facilities and accommodation scored moderately.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the inclusive environment, knowledgeable and engaging professors, and ample academic and extracurricular opportunities. The university is also commended for its affordability and support for student success.
About 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors, a welcoming atmosphere, and good facilities. A small portion (~7%) of negative feedback points to issues with teaching quality and administrative support.
Approximately 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-focused learning and experienced faculty. A small percentage (~3%) mention administrative issues and industrial action impacting studies.
University of Peshawar reviews are largely positive (~65%), highlighting a beautiful campus, good academic programs, and supportive faculty. A small portion of feedback (~10%) notes issues with outdated department facilities and concerns about GPA system fairness.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Rating: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5 — one extra star because tuition was free) I studied Software Technology at Linnaeus University between 2022 and 2025. In my experience, the quality of teaching was mediocre. I quickly stopped attending lectures because most added little beyond what I could learn independently. Industry connections were almost nonexistent: no internship support, no company-led workshops, no hackathons, and no clear pathways into the tech sector. The only recurring event was the annual job fair, but many representatives seemed unsure what they were seeking; most offered no internships or projects and there was rarely any follow-up, so it felt more promotional than student-focused. Entrepreneurship support was minimal. When we started a student project, there was no funding, no events, no network, and very limited guidance — essentially just one counsellor providing basic advice. Faculty culture felt very political and unresponsive to student feedback. When issues were raised formally, they were often dismissed, though quiet changes were occasionally made later. I personally experienced hostile and dismissive behaviour from a lecturer in the tech faculty, which I reported to the Student Union in 2024 along with other classmates. The case was closed in the lecturer’s favour, yet the university quietly implemented some of the changes we had requested. The complaint process left me uncertain about its independence, and I believe there’s a need for more transparent procedures and external oversight. On the positive side, there are a few excellent professors who genuinely care about their students and involve them in research, but they are a small minority and you have to actively seek them out. Overall, I’m deeply disappointed with the university’s approach to education and student development. I feel I wasted three years of potential growth and opportunity here. Prospective students should do thorough research and speak directly with current students before enrolling.
Unfortunately, I had to go to RMIT University in Australia, and I have to admit that it was the most disappointing and unpleasant experience of my life. It was immediately apparent that this establishment was not at all what it purported to be—a prominent university. First and foremost, dealing with the RMIT administration is a complete headache. They are uncoordinated, unresponsive, and don't appear to care about genuinely assisting kids in succeeding. I had to wait weeks for a simple inquiry to be resolved, and even then, the answers I got were sometimes wrong or conflicting. The quality of education at RMIT is also severely lacking. Many of the professors are disinterested and seem to have no real passion for teaching. The curriculum is outdated, and the coursework often feels irrelevant to real-world applications. It's clear that the university is more concerned with making a profit than actually providing a quality education. The facilities at RMIT are in a sorry state as well. The classrooms are cramped and outdated, and the library is sorely lacking in resources. It's as if the university is stuck in the past and has no interest in investing in modern facilities for its students. Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of my time at RMIT was the lack of support for students. There is a complete lack of career services and guidance for students looking to enter the job market. It's as if the university expects you to figure it all out on your own. In summary, I would strongly advise anyone considering RMIT University in Australia to think twice. The administration is a mess, the education is subpar, and the lack of support for students is disheartening. Save yourself the time, money, and frustration and look elsewhere for your education.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
