Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL vs European School of Management and Technology - ESMT Berlin vs Cass Business School vs Cardiff Business School vs L'École des sciences de l'information - ESI

Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL (5.00)
Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas - UDISTRITAL: wins 4/5 categories
European School of Management and Technology - ESMT Berlin: wins 1/5 categories
Cass Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Cardiff Business School: wins 0/5 categories
L'École des sciences de l'information - ESI: wins 0/5 categories
University of Technology Jamaica - UTECH: wins 0/5 categories
Achievers University - AUO: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Mathematics
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Cardiff, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Information and Knowledge Management
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Biomedical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.33
4.33
4.43
2.00
3.58
2.67
Location
5.00
5.00
4.44
4.43
5.00
3.90
3.00
Professors
5.00
Win
4.33
4.40
4.35
4.00
3.75
3.33
Internationality
3.00
4.50
Win
4.30
4.04
3.00
4.00
3.67
Student life
3.00
4.33
4.33
4.00
2.00
3.92
3.50
Value
5.00
Win
4.50
4.50
4.26
3.00
4.25
4.00
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.33
4.00
4.38
2.00
3.08
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse faculties and engaging university activities
  • +Strong analytical and technical skills, especially in mathematics and data
  • +Passion for learning and pursuing advanced studies
  • +Passionate, knowledgeable professors and engaging teaching
  • +Practical, real-world-focused curriculum
  • +Dynamic community and vibrant atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and effective teaching methods
  • +Diverse student body and valuable networking opportunities
  • +Strong career services and diverse program specializations
  • +Excellent, supportive lecturers and creative teaching methods.
  • +Strong student support services and good career prospects.
  • +Interesting course content and a good learning experience.
  • +Strong technical education and research focus
  • +Highly valued teachers and rich program offerings
  • +Development of essential research and communication skills
  • +Practical, hands-on teaching and theoretical foundations
  • +Dedicated and supportive faculty
  • +Diverse student body and extracurricular activities
  • +Engaging academics with close lecturer-student interaction
  • +Safe environment with extracurricular opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on discipline and character development
Cons
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Disorganized and inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication and transparency are frequently lacking.
  • -Administrative & management issues created chaos and imbalance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engaging course content are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution earns excellent scores in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and accommodation all received perfect marks, indicating a strong foundation. Student life and internationality are areas for potential growth, with both scoring a respectable but lower 3 out of 5. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture, particularly in its core offerings and infrastructure.

Remarkably high scores characterize this university's performance. Its location stands out with a perfect 5.0 rating, marking it as its strongest area. Areas such as facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation all received excellent scores of 4.33. Internationality and value were also strong, both earning 4.5. No significant weaknesses were identified, with all categories receiving positive feedback.

This university garners excellent reviews across most aspects. Its strongest areas are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a high 4.44 and 4.5 respectively. Professors and student life also receive very positive marks. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which, while still good, sits at a 4.0, slightly below the other categories. Internationality and Facilities are also well-regarded.

Overall, this institution garners positive evaluations. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Location, both receiving a rating of 4.43. Accommodations also score well at 4.38. Student Life is the weakest area surveyed, with a rating of 4.00, followed closely by Internationality at 4.04. Professors and Value also received solid scores, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

This university excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and demonstrates solid performance in **professors** and **internationality**. Conversely, areas needing significant improvement include **facilities**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, all scoring a low 2. The university offers a moderate **value** proposition.

This institution excels in several key areas, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4), closely followed by **Location** and **Student Life** (both 3.9). Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.08, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Professors fall within a solid mid-range.

This university's value for money is a standout strength, earning a perfect 4. Internationality and student life also received positive marks, both above 3.5. Conversely, the facilities are a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors and accommodation are rated moderately.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5, university student reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Feedback highlights strong mathematical interests and analytical skills, alongside participation in research and academic events. The university offers diverse faculties and engaging activities.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight passionate professors, engaging classes, and exceptional education quality. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and valuable career opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

With a ~96% positive sentiment, students praise remarkable lecturers, supportive services, and engaging course material. One negative review noted poor overall management and inconsistent workload.

The sole review highlights a rich engineering program with great teachers, fostering research and communication skills. While positive (~100%), it suggests a need for more technical focus and data tools.

With a 4.33/5 average rating, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical, hands-on teaching, strong theoretical foundations, and preparation for the workforce. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students highlight growth, academic improvement, and a great learning experience with engaging lecturers and opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
33%
60%
52%
0%
50%
0%
4★
0%
67%
30%
35%
100%
33%
67%
3★
0%
0%
10%
9%
0%
17%
33%
2★
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Well qualified professors and great connectons with the industry

Well structured programs, great facilities and very good career development team. The alumni relations with the school are great and well maintained and fostered. Overall a great school right in the middle of Berlin.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close