Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC

Side-by-side comparison from 38 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH (4.70)
Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/5 categories
Colegio Iberoamericano Barnard - CIB: wins 0/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Center for Higher Studies in Legal and Criminological Sciences - CESCIJUC: wins 3/5 categories
Normal 2 de Nezahualcóyotl - EN2N: wins 0/5 categories
Faculty of Higher Studies Iztacala - FESI: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: History
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Pedagogical Education
Best programme: Ecology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Professors
4.50
4.41
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.50
4.59
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Student life
4.00
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Value
5.00
4.63
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.66
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
  • +Academic excellence and quality professors
  • +Career-focused and demanding programs
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Diverse courses and flexible schedules
  • +Affordable fees and degree options
  • +Expert professors with strong credentials

Nothing to show

  • +Professional and capable professors
  • +Improved curriculum and student development focus
  • +Adequate facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Excessive workload and demanding assignments are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration and confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is often described as rigid, uninspiring, and not relevant to current needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution boasts exceptional strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these domains. Conversely, the university's accommodation received a score of zero, suggesting this is a significant area for improvement and a notable weakness.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in student life and perceived value, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, its location and internationality are noted as weaker aspects, earning just two out of five points. Facilities and professors are rated positively at a solid four, while accommodation falls in the middle with a three.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a single review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The student praised its academic offerings, diverse course options, and affordable fees, while noting some administrative shortcomings.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was ~100% positive, highlighting professional professors and an improved curriculum. Facilities were adequate, though some material shortages were noted.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
67%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
33%
39%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close