University of Lusaka - UNILUS vs The University of Zambia - UNZA vs Texila American University vs Zambia Centre for Accountancy Studies - ZCAS vs Levy Mwanawasa Medical University - LMMU
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible academic programs and supportive environment
- +Quality education with emphasis on theory and practical application
- +Modern facilities and engaging extracurricular activities
- +Rigorous academic programs with practical application
- +Knowledgeable and dedicated faculty
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Diverse student body and multicultural interactions
- +Abundant resources and supportive lecturers
- +Excellent accountancy and finance programs
- +Strong career readiness and professional qualifications
- +Flexible learning options
Nothing to show
- +High-quality teaching and supportive learning environment
- +Good student support and communication
- +Engaging activities and stress relief
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
- -Ineffective instruction and lack of support hinder learning.
- -Outdated teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum waste valuable learning time.
- -Insufficient practical experience and patient interaction hinder skill development.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is frequently perceived as irrelevant or too theoretical.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues often cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication leads to confusion and dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably its **Value** (4.85) and **Facilities** (4.77). **Professors** (4.69) and **Internationality** (4.62) also received strong marks. The university's **Location** and **Student Life** were rated similarly (4.23), representing its comparatively lower-scoring categories. **Accommodations** (4.38) fall between these two groups.
Considering student feedback, the university excels in **Location** (4.35) and **Value** (4.46), suggesting these are significant draws. **Professors** (4.12) also receive positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.43) and **Facilities** (2.92) appear to be areas needing improvement, indicated by considerably lower scores. Student Life and Internationality fall within a moderate range.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, its facilities received a zero rating, indicating a significant area for improvement. Accommodation and value for money are rated moderately, suggesting a balanced but not exceptional experience in these aspects.
With solid scores across most aspects, this institution shines in its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality** received moderate ratings, suggesting areas for potential improvement. The university offers good **Value** for its students, reflecting a positive overall experience.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent scores in several key areas, notably its location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Facilities and overall value are also strong, rated at 4. However, a significant weakness emerges in accommodation, which scored a low 1.5. Professors are moderately rated at 3.5.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.85, all 13 reviews are positive. Students praise the flexible academic programs, supportive learning environment, and quality facilities. No negative feedback was reported.
The University of Zambia is highly praised by ~85% of students for its solid academic programs and dedicated faculty. A small percentage (~4%) noted a need for modern teaching methods and more practical research.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. Students highlight a diversity of international students and available resources. Admin staff are noted for needing improvement.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The single positive review highlights strong programs in accountancy, finance, and business studies, with options for various learning modes. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
All feedback received is positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the welcoming learning environment, quality of teaching, and supportive staff. Some noted tuition fees can be challenging.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The programme I studied the university not only instilled knowledge in me in the information field but also in social issues and administration. I also enjoyed stay on campus as it gave me access to the library until late hours and also, I could mingle with other students and form communities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My overall experience at Cavendish University Zambia has been good. The learning environment is welcoming, and the institution tries to make student life smooth and supportive. One of the things I appreciated most was the quality of teaching. The lecturers are generally clear, knowledgeable, and committed to helping students understand the material. Communication between students and the academic team is also handled well important updates are shared, and there is effort from the staff to stay available when needed. In terms of accessibility, I would say the lecturers are fairly reachable. While they may not always be available instantly due to their schedules, they do make time to respond, guide, and offer academic support when approached respectfully. If there is one area that could be improved, it would be the accessibility of learning materials. Sometimes getting certain resources or updated content can take a bit longer than expected, and enhancing the university’s systems for sharing materials would really elevate the student experience. Overall, Cavendish University is a good institution with strong teaching and fair communication, and with a bit more improvement in resource accessibility, it has the potential to be even better.
Nothing to show