University of Vigo vs Portland State University vs Mandhu College vs Code Institute vs Moshood Abiola Polytechnic - Mapoly

Side-by-side comparison from 139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Portland State University (4.30)
University of Vigo: wins 0/7 categories
Portland State University: wins 6/7 categories
Mandhu College: wins 0/7 categories
Code Institute: wins 1/7 categories
Moshood Abiola Polytechnic - Mapoly : wins 0/7 categories
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences - Sais: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Portland, Oregon, United States
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
49 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Male, Maldives
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Dublin, Ireland
2.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
3.89
4.29
Win
Not rated
1.00
2.40
3.00
Location
3.50
4.34
Win
Not rated
1.00
3.00
3.00
Professors
3.89
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.00
4.00
Internationality
3.72
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.80
3.00
Student life
3.94
4.40
Win
Not rated
1.00
3.80
3.00
Value
3.94
4.27
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.60
3.00
Accommodation
3.94
4.10
Win
Not rated
1.00
2.40
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming and diverse student environment
  • +High employability and available student support services
  • +Modern facilities and supportive study spaces
  • +Dynamic education with diverse and inclusive environment
  • +Career development support and personal relationships with lecturers

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging and effective teaching methods
  • +Supportive and approachable instructors
  • +Valuable career preparation and networking opportunities
  • +Well-structured, resourceful curriculum preparing students for industry
  • +Practical assignments and projects fostering growth

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unclear course structures.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities require urgent repairs.
  • -Poor transportation links and distance from the city.
  • -Ineffective instruction and lack of instructor support hinder learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources create a poor learning environment.
  • -Administrative and management issues lead to disorganization and frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of adequate course material and external support.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Administrative and management inefficiencies.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
  • -Poor organization impacts daily student life.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the standout area. The university also received strong marks for its **Professors** and **Accommodation**. Areas that performed less strongly include **Location** and **Facilities**. **Internationality** and **Value** received good, though not exceptional, scores.

This institution garners strong marks across most aspects of the student experience. Professors receive the highest rating, indicating exceptional academic guidance. Student life and location are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodations present the lowest score, suggesting an area for potential improvement, though they still maintain a respectable rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a positive and well-rounded offering.

Nothing to show

With a perfect score in **Internationality**, this institution clearly excels in global engagement. Conversely, its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** received the lowest possible marks, indicating significant areas for improvement. The university offers a moderate **Value** and its **Professors** are rated adequately, suggesting a mixed student experience.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance in its ratings. Student life stands out as the strongest area, receiving a high score. In contrast, facilities and accommodation present the weakest points, with significantly lower ratings. Other aspects, such as professors, location, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good careers, excellent professors, and a welcoming student environment. A small percentage of negative feedback exists, with one mention of outdated evaluation regulations and another of faculty issues.

With a 4.35 average rating from 49 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~98%). Recurring themes highlight a dynamic and demanding education, a supportive and modern learning environment (especially in engineering), and strong career services. Accommodations are also praised for being clean, safe, and convenient. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With a 2/5 average rating and 100% of feedback being negative, this university program faces criticism for a significant lack of support and incomplete, uninformative materials. Students report needing to rely heavily on external resources to complete assignments.

Two of five reviews are positive, highlighting resourceful curriculum and professional preparation. One negative review (20%) cites disorganization in areas like registration and school structure.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
12%
37%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
53%
61%
0%
0%
40%
0%
3★
33%
2%
0%
0%
40%
100%
2★
2%
0%
0%
100%
20%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close