Universidad la Gran Colombia - UGC vs The John Naisbitt University vs The Ohio State University - OSU vs Oxademy Business School - OBS vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong economics, law, and political science programs
- +Excellent preparation for the labor market
- +University prestige and history
- +Practical experience through internships
- +Engaging lectures and seminars
- +Supportive faculty and professors
- +Strong academic programs and tailored support
- +Community and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessible resources and helpful faculty
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff creates confusion.
- -Declining academic quality and poor career prospects.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Inconsistent or poor quality of instruction and curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Professors receive the highest marks, reflecting a strong academic core. Facilities and value also score well, indicating a positive learning environment and good return on investment. However, location and internationality present opportunities for improvement, with lower scores in these areas. Student life and accommodation fall within the middle range of ratings.
Across all surveyed categories, the university received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates that all aspects, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, are performing at the lowest possible level. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses, as all areas present an equal and concerning lack of positive performance.
Offering a well-rounded university experience, ratings reveal exceptional strengths in **Facilities**, achieving a score of 4.63, and **Student Life**, rated at 4.53. Areas that show room for growth, though still solid, include **Accomodation** at 4.2 and **Internationality** at 4.29. The university also scores well in Professors, Location, and Value.
Nothing to show
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive. Students praise rigorous economics and law programs, excellent professional preparation, and the university's prestige. No negative feedback was received.
One positive review highlights practical experience and internships, while one negative review points to declining lecture quality and perceived poor graduate employability. Sentiment is split, with approximately 50% of feedback being negative.
With a ~100% positive sentiment, reviewers praise academic programs and personalized support. Students highlight opportunities for growth, a strong sense of community, and exceptional educational experiences.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Back then (in my student days) John Naisbitt University was Megatrend University. I graduated from Faculty of business studies and as years were passing by I realized that quality of lectures, seminars and exams significantly dropped off, to the point where I was aware that it is going to be really difficult to continue with a career. Nowadays employers skip most of CVs with John Naisbitt graduates because they know that quality of their knowledge is weak and working habits are bad. For instance, 8 out of 10 John Naisbitt graduates, including myself got their internship/job because of their relatives, cousins or even friends with influence. Unfortunately, this is the way things are going in Serbia. I would highly recommend for fresh students to skip John Naisbitt University because private universities in Serbia are not being controlled by the government and their goal is just to "produce" graduates. However, faculties of the Belgrade University and the University of Novi Sad give really strong basis to graduates and employers around the world know that these students got their marks by hard work and commitment.
Its a great versatile university with great faculty, facilities and education. Brilliant scholarly excellence and experience center. Great undergrad, graduate and postdoctoral research opportunities with cutting edge facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show