Instituto Tecnológico Superior del Oriente del Estado de Hidalgo - ITESA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 53 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Instituto Tecnológico Superior del Oriente del Estado de Hidalgo - ITESA (5.00)
Instituto Tecnológico Superior del Oriente del Estado de Hidalgo - ITESA: wins 4/4 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/4 categories
Rizal Technological University: wins 0/4 categories
Knutsford University College - KNUTSFORD: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Systems Engineering
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Mandaluyong, Philippines
4.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.50
4.33
Not rated
5.00
3.00
4.00
Location
5.00
4.50
4.25
Not rated
5.00
3.67
4.50
Professors
5.00
Win
4.41
4.50
Not rated
3.00
3.67
4.50
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.59
3.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
3.50
Student life
5.00
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
4.33
3.00
Value
5.00
Win
4.63
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
3.50
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.66
3.75
Not rated
4.00
3.67
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and experienced faculty
  • +Positive and growth-oriented environment
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Inspiring professors and supportive student leaders
  • +Inclusive environment and diverse academic programs
  • +Quality of education and learning experience
  • +Friendly and good lecturers
  • +Quality academic programs and infrastructure
  • +Well-rounded course outlines and great learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of support and clear communication
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication leads to confusion and frustration.
Rating summary
What students say

Consistently stellar marks distinguish this institution. Every aspect, from its **facilities** and **professors** to **location**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value**, has earned a perfect score of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience with no particular weaknesses identified in this assessment.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance, particularly in student life, earning a high rating of 4.33. Internationality and value are also noteworthy strengths at 4. Accommodation, location, and professors are all rated consistently around 3.67. The weakest area identified is facilities, with a rating of 3.

Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **professors** and **location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Facilities** also score well with 4 stars. Conversely, areas such as **student life** and **accommodation** are rated lower at 3 stars, indicating potential for improvement. The university presents a middle-ground performance in **internationality** and **value**, each earning 3.5 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight personal and professional growth opportunities, supportive teachers who share experiences, and a positive atmosphere. No negative feedback was recorded.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews suggest a positive university experience for ~67% of students. Recurring themes highlight respected gender identity policies, engaging programs, and helpful, knowledgeable professors.

With an average rating of 4/5, students praise friendly lecturers and quality academic programs. Essential infrastructure like libraries and ICT labs are highlighted positively.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
33%
0%
50%
33%
0%
4★
0%
39%
58%
0%
0%
33%
100%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close