Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs Nnamdi Azikiwe University vs Lancaster University Leipzig vs College of Crete MBS vs Madonna University Nigeria

Side-by-side comparison from 235 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Lancaster University Leipzig (5.00)
Delft University of Technology - TU Delft: wins 0/7 categories
Nnamdi Azikiwe University: wins 0/7 categories
Lancaster University Leipzig: wins 7/7 categories
College of Crete MBS: wins 0/7 categories
Madonna University Nigeria: wins 0/7 categories
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Awka: wins 0/7 categories
IEM Kolkata - IEM Kolkata: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Aerospace Engineering
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Heraklion, Greece
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Medical Laboratory Sciences
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.45
3.59
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.56
3.26
Not rated
Location
4.32
3.94
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.53
3.66
Not rated
Professors
4.16
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.94
4.23
Not rated
Internationality
4.45
3.74
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.56
3.59
Not rated
Student life
3.99
3.88
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.20
3.97
Not rated
Value
4.35
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
4.41
Not rated
Accommodation
2.98
3.56
4.00
Win
Not rated
2.93
3.42
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming community and diverse people
  • +Challenging, practical, and focused engineering curriculum
  • +Inspiring and unique learning environment
  • +Quality education and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Conducive learning environment and accessible facilities
  • +Personal growth and real-world preparation
  • +Welcoming and diverse environment with awesome staff
  • +Opportunities for language learning and cultural immersion
  • +Positive overall experience and feeling of making the right choice

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent, approachable faculty and strong academic programs
  • +Structured and disciplined environment for academic focus
  • +Practical, globally oriented learning with real-world application
  • +Experienced lecturers and strong academic programs
  • +Excellent facilities and infrastructure
  • +Supportive environment fostering personal growth and creativity

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical understanding.
  • -Negative student experience and feeling ignored or pushed aside.
  • -Programmatic issues and outdated facilities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of practical learning and reliance on theory is a concern.
  • -The environment can be toxic and mentally exhausting.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including discipline and student division tactics.
  • -Lack of adequate and hygienic school amenities, especially hostels.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient academic support are significant concerns.
  • -Inefficient and unhelpful administrative processes create frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent reviews in several key areas, notably Facilities and Internationality, both scoring exceptionally high. Value and Location also received strong positive feedback. However, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness, with a considerably lower rating compared to other aspects. Student Life, while good, is also an area that shows room for improvement.

With an overall strong performance, this university excels in **Value** (4.17) and **Professors** (4.10). Student life is also well-regarded, with **Location** (3.94) and **Student Life** (3.88) receiving positive marks. The **Facilities** (3.59) and **Accomodation** (3.56) are its comparatively weaker areas, though still rated above average. Internationality scores a solid 3.74.

Consistently outstanding feedback marks this institution, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and international appeal. Accommodations represent the sole area of slight variance, receiving a strong but not perfect rating. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional value, reflecting a highly positive student experience.

Nothing to show

This university garners its highest marks for **Value**, achieving a score of 4.25. Professors are also highly rated at 3.94. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score, at 2.93. Facilities and Internationality are rated similarly (3.56), with Location close behind (3.53). Student Life sits in the middle (3.2).

This university's profile shows a strong emphasis on **Value** and **Professors**, which received the highest ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Student life, location, accommodation, and internationality received moderately positive reviews, indicating a generally well-rounded experience for students, albeit with room for improvement in physical resources.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With 99 positive reviews (approximately 90%), students praise the welcoming atmosphere, varied academic programs, and practical learning approach. A small percentage of negative feedback (approximately 2.7%) mentioned some challenges with teaching quality and student support.

~95.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting quality education, good lecturers, and a supportive environment. A small percentage (~4.4%) mention poor management and technical issues.

With one review yielding an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. The single review highlighted a welcoming, diverse environment with opportunities for language and cultural learning, praising staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

University reviews show a highly positive sentiment, with ~74% of feedback being 4–5 stars. Students praise approachable lecturers, a practical, globally oriented curriculum, and a structured, disciplined academic environment. One reviewer found rules to be strict and the atmosphere akin to a military camp.

With a 4.08 average rating and ~0% negative feedback, reviews highlight a journey of self-discovery and independence (~74% positive). Students praise flexible postgraduate plans and excellent campus life, with experienced lecturers and modern facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
36%
41%
100%
0%
38%
31%
0%
4★
54%
35%
0%
0%
31%
46%
0%
3★
7%
20%
0%
0%
25%
23%
0%
2★
2%
1%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
1★
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My Experience: IDE Bachelor at TU Delft

Hello, [Skip to "Conclusion" for a brief summary] In this post, I’ll share my experience with the TU Delft Industrial Design Engineering bachelor's program as a graduate, so that future students can make a more informed decision. I chose this bachelor’s program because I expected it to involve a lot of engineering and technical content, which would help me understand how most products are made, think production techniques, appropriate material use, product manufacturing, and the integration of technology and mathematics that’s common in modern products. However, I ended up learning very little about these topics during my time in the program. The study mainly consisted of filling out Miro (an online platform) templates, coming up with systems, and focusing on sustainability (which, to be fair, isn't necessarily a bad thing). But I never felt like I was learning anything new; I was just repeatedly filling in the same kinds of templates for the DP/PO (Design Project/Project Organisatie) courses throughout the full three years. Each year, you follow two DP/PO courses. The only courses I personally found useful in terms of learning product design were the drawing classes and a first-year SolidWorks course (3D modeling). Normally, I find math courses boring and difficult, but thanks to this bachelor’s, I actually really enjoyed the two math/physics courses (Product Dynamics and Product Statics). For the first time in a while, I felt like I was doing something meaningful, had to put in effort, and was actually learning something new. Another thing I really disliked about this program is how “school-like” it’s structured. You're required to be on campus every day from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM, working in a so-called “studio” (classroom) with your fellow students, supposedly to learn from each other. This might work for some people, but for me (and I think for others too), it didn’t. I can’t focus well in noisy, crowded spaces, and I rarely connected with my fellow students. The social atmosphere was always centered around the typical student lifestyle (like student associations), and I wasn’t involved in that kind of life at all. The strict scheduling was probably the worst part. It made me feel like I was still in high school, instead of being a responsible adult who should be allowed to structure their own time. In many courses, you’re also penalized if you’re absent or not actively participating in class. Your final grade often drops as a result, especially since there’s always a rubric item about “communication and presence” of the student. Now on to a very different, but important point I want to share. I’m a guy with a Turkish background/ethnicity. This has, in my experience, had a significant impact on how I was treated and assessed during my studies. Because of my appearance, I stood out a lot in this predominantly Dutch/white bachelor’s program. I was one of the very few students with a migration background (I could count them on one hand, out of 300+ students in my year). In group projects and reports, I often felt like I wasn’t taken seriously by the lecturers. I never really felt welcome at the faculty or in the studios, I often felt like an outsider. The assessments for reports/projects were always subjective. Yes, there’s a so-called “rubric,” but it’s completely vague and can be interpreted in many ways, so you never know whether you’ve actually met the expectations. In my opinion, grading was purely based on the teacher’s personal opinion, and this was even confirmed by one of the teachers, who admitted the rubrics were “kind of nonsense” and that they just decide the grade based on how they feel about you and your work. As a result, I rarely received high marks for assignments, even though I consistently scored 8s on exams, which are graded objectively. I even went to the study advisor once because I had been unfairly graded. But even the study advisor couldn’t care less. He flat-out said “NO” to my face when I expressed my concerns emotionally. I didn’t even get a fake “that’s unfortunate” or a polite smile. That showed me that basic empathy is not standard for everyone. In my view, these are the bare minimum responses you’d expect when a student is struggling. That’s why I want to clearly state in this post that, in my experience, there’s a significant amount of racism within the IDE bachelor’s program at TU Delft. You might be wondering, after reading all this, “Why didn’t you just quit the program?” I started this program during the COVID outbreak, which meant my entire first year was online (with mandatory Zoom attendance from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM). So at first, I thought my negative experience was due to the pandemic. When I finally got to campus in my second year, I realized too late that this program just wasn’t the right fit for me. But I’m someone who always sees things through and doesn’t quit halfway. Since I had already completed more than a year, I was determined to finish. Conclusion All in all, I strongly advise against choosing this bachelor’s program if your goal is to pursue a real engineering-focused, challenging, and educational degree, because IDE at TU Delft is certainly not that. To future students with a migrant background: only consider this program if you’re planning to do it with a friend. You’re unlikely to make many friends here, and you’ll probably end up feeling lonely and like an outsider, especially if your values or cultural background differ from the average “IDE” student. I’m now studying something else at a different university, and I’m much happier. I’m achieving great results and feel appreciated. Just to be clear: my review is not about TU Delft as a whole, it is specifically about the Industrial Design Engineering bachelor’s program. If you have any questions after reading my “mini-book,” feel free to send me a private message on Reddit or leave a comment under this post. I’m happy to help you make a better-informed study decision, something I, unfortunately, didn’t have.

My Review

My Experience at Nnamdi Azikiwe University as a Computer Science Student Studying Computer Science at Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) was a formative and eye-opening experience. The university is one of Nigeria’s leading federal institutions, so it attracts a diverse student body and a broad range of lecturers and researchers. What I Liked • Quality of Lecturers: Many of the lecturers in the Computer Science department are knowledgeable and genuinely interested in students’ success. Some go the extra mile to share real-life industry insights, not just theory. • Curriculum Breadth: The course structure covers core areas like programming, algorithms, data structures, operating systems, networking, and database systems. This gave me a strong theoretical base. • Opportunities for Growth: There are student tech clubs, Google developer groups, and hackathons on campus. Participating in these helped me build practical skills beyond coursework. • Diverse Community: The mix of students from different states and cultures makes campus life lively and exposes you to new perspectives. What I Disliked • Infrastructure Challenges: Computer labs sometimes lacked up-to-date hardware or steady internet access, which limited hands-on practice. • Large Class Sizes: Some courses had very large classes, making it harder to get individual attention. • Administrative Delays: Like many public universities in Nigeria, you may experience delays in results processing or scheduling. What Stood Out to Me • The enthusiasm of students in self-organised coding clubs and competitions—this created a strong informal learning environment. • Lecturers who incorporated research topics and practical projects into their courses. • The vibrant social and cultural life on campus—events, student organisations, and entrepreneurship opportunities are everywhere. Would I Recommend It? Yes—if you are self-motivated and willing to supplement your classroom learning with online resources and extracurricular activities. UNIZIK offers a solid theoretical foundation, and with personal initiative you can graduate with competitive skills. However, if you expect state-of-the-art facilities or a highly personalised teaching style, you might find it challenging.

Great environment

Lancaster University Leipzig is one of a few English speaking schools in Leipzig. The environment of the school is very welcoming and it's very diverse. Everyone, including the staff, are absolutely awesome. There are so many opportunities here, you can learn german if you can't really speak and learn different cultures because of the diversity of the school. I made a right choice coming here.

Nothing to show

One of the best in Academics and morals

Madonna University is one of the best universities in Nigeria to obtain a medical degree. Professors are seasoned and well qualified with a system that ensures syllabus are properly covered with our well equipped laboratories. Great sports facilities and conducive learning environments There are restrictions with movements as every student is expected to live on campus. It is generally a great place to be.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close