Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Dr. Cristóbal Mendoza - IUTCM vs Shantou University vs University of Huddersfield vs Masinde Muliro University of Science and Technology - MMUST
Side-by-side comparison from 229 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engineering focus and advanced technical content
- +Practical learning approach and creative expression
- +Supportive community and inspiring peers/lecturers
- +Excellent teachers
- +Good career prospects
- +Excellent infrastructure
- +Student-centered approach and personalized development
- +Excellent accommodation and modern facilities
- +Liberal academic atmosphere and international standards
- +Knowledgeable, friendly, and supportive tutors
- +Excellent facilities and industry-level equipment
- +Strong student support and campus amenities
- +Nurturing environment for talent and skill development.
- +Quality learning with good lecturer-student ratio and practical focus.
- +Conducive learning environment with good infrastructure and technology.
- +Supportive and friendly faculty
- +Positive and encouraging university environment
- +Supportive staff & faculty investment
- +Engaging teaching & effective career support
- +Good campus life & modern facilities
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical understanding.
- -Unhelpful and pushy academic and administrative staff.
- -Students feel ignored and not supported in their learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are often mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of support, unclear communication, and administrative problems frustrate students.
- -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or not well-taught.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of individual attention.
- -Poorly maintained facilities and outdated equipment.
- -Ineffective and unsupportive administrative and management.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear policies create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of effective communication and clear expectations frustrate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are a major concern.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Facilities and Internationality standing out as particularly strong at over 4.4. Location and Value also receive high marks, reflecting positively on the student experience. Conversely, Accomodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student Life, while decent, also falls slightly behind the higher-rated aspects.
This institution presents a uniform rating across all assessed aspects. Consequently, no particular strengths or weaknesses can be identified within the provided data. The university received identical scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, indicating an average or baseline performance across the board.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, student life, and accommodation. Professors and internationality are also highly rated, at a strong 4. The university's weakest aspect, however, is its location, receiving a score of only 2. Overall, it offers good value for students seeking a vibrant campus experience with excellent amenities.
This university receives consistently positive ratings, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a score of 4.28. **Professors** (4.26) and **Facilities** (4.26) also perform very strongly. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded at 4.18. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include **Student Life** (3.96) and **Accomodation** (3.96).
An overall strong university profile emerges from these ratings, with particularly high scores for **Professors** (4.475) and **Value** (4.45). **Location** (4.378) and **Student Life** (4.351) also received excellent marks. The lowest-rated categories, though still respectable, are **Accomodation** (3.838) and **Internationality** (3.775). Facilities are rated moderately at 4.077.
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, with perfect ratings for both location and accommodation. Facilities and professors also receive high marks, indicating a strong academic and physical environment. Student life and value for money are solid, though internationality presents a relative weakness compared to other aspects.
This institution garners positive feedback across most areas, with its **strongest performances in Internationality and Value**, both scoring 3.625. Professors also receive a commendable rating of 3.8125. Conversely, **Facilities represent the weakest area**, averaging a score of 2.647. Student life, accommodation, and location fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory but not exceptional experiences in these aspects.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with ~90% of reviews praising learning materials, practical approaches, and supportive communities. A small minority (~3%) express concerns about specific program content and pedagogical approaches.
With a single review, the university is rated a perfect 5/5. This feedback highlighted excellent teachers, strong career prospects, and ideal infrastructure. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives predominantly positive feedback, approximately 100% of reviews are favorable. Students praise its student-centered approach, quality accommodation, modern facilities, and liberal academic atmosphere.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 from 60 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~93%). Students highlight knowledgeable tutors, good course support, and helpful university staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.35/5 average, ~88% of 40 reviews are positive, praising good lecturer-student ratios, talent nurturing, and conducive learning environments. A small ~5% of feedback is negative.
Students express high satisfaction, with 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include a good university environment and supportive, friendly faculty who encourage learning.
A high percentage of positive feedback (around 69%) highlights supportive staff, engaging teaching, and good campus life. Some note theoretical focus and stress as areas for improvement.
Hello, [Skip to "Conclusion" for a brief summary] In this post, I’ll share my experience with the TU Delft Industrial Design Engineering bachelor's program as a graduate, so that future students can make a more informed decision. I chose this bachelor’s program because I expected it to involve a lot of engineering and technical content, which would help me understand how most products are made, think production techniques, appropriate material use, product manufacturing, and the integration of technology and mathematics that’s common in modern products. However, I ended up learning very little about these topics during my time in the program. The study mainly consisted of filling out Miro (an online platform) templates, coming up with systems, and focusing on sustainability (which, to be fair, isn't necessarily a bad thing). But I never felt like I was learning anything new; I was just repeatedly filling in the same kinds of templates for the DP/PO (Design Project/Project Organisatie) courses throughout the full three years. Each year, you follow two DP/PO courses. The only courses I personally found useful in terms of learning product design were the drawing classes and a first-year SolidWorks course (3D modeling). Normally, I find math courses boring and difficult, but thanks to this bachelor’s, I actually really enjoyed the two math/physics courses (Product Dynamics and Product Statics). For the first time in a while, I felt like I was doing something meaningful, had to put in effort, and was actually learning something new. Another thing I really disliked about this program is how “school-like” it’s structured. You're required to be on campus every day from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM, working in a so-called “studio” (classroom) with your fellow students, supposedly to learn from each other. This might work for some people, but for me (and I think for others too), it didn’t. I can’t focus well in noisy, crowded spaces, and I rarely connected with my fellow students. The social atmosphere was always centered around the typical student lifestyle (like student associations), and I wasn’t involved in that kind of life at all. The strict scheduling was probably the worst part. It made me feel like I was still in high school, instead of being a responsible adult who should be allowed to structure their own time. In many courses, you’re also penalized if you’re absent or not actively participating in class. Your final grade often drops as a result, especially since there’s always a rubric item about “communication and presence” of the student. Now on to a very different, but important point I want to share. I’m a guy with a Turkish background/ethnicity. This has, in my experience, had a significant impact on how I was treated and assessed during my studies. Because of my appearance, I stood out a lot in this predominantly Dutch/white bachelor’s program. I was one of the very few students with a migration background (I could count them on one hand, out of 300+ students in my year). In group projects and reports, I often felt like I wasn’t taken seriously by the lecturers. I never really felt welcome at the faculty or in the studios, I often felt like an outsider. The assessments for reports/projects were always subjective. Yes, there’s a so-called “rubric,” but it’s completely vague and can be interpreted in many ways, so you never know whether you’ve actually met the expectations. In my opinion, grading was purely based on the teacher’s personal opinion, and this was even confirmed by one of the teachers, who admitted the rubrics were “kind of nonsense” and that they just decide the grade based on how they feel about you and your work. As a result, I rarely received high marks for assignments, even though I consistently scored 8s on exams, which are graded objectively. I even went to the study advisor once because I had been unfairly graded. But even the study advisor couldn’t care less. He flat-out said “NO” to my face when I expressed my concerns emotionally. I didn’t even get a fake “that’s unfortunate” or a polite smile. That showed me that basic empathy is not standard for everyone. In my view, these are the bare minimum responses you’d expect when a student is struggling. That’s why I want to clearly state in this post that, in my experience, there’s a significant amount of racism within the IDE bachelor’s program at TU Delft. You might be wondering, after reading all this, “Why didn’t you just quit the program?” I started this program during the COVID outbreak, which meant my entire first year was online (with mandatory Zoom attendance from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM). So at first, I thought my negative experience was due to the pandemic. When I finally got to campus in my second year, I realized too late that this program just wasn’t the right fit for me. But I’m someone who always sees things through and doesn’t quit halfway. Since I had already completed more than a year, I was determined to finish. Conclusion All in all, I strongly advise against choosing this bachelor’s program if your goal is to pursue a real engineering-focused, challenging, and educational degree, because IDE at TU Delft is certainly not that. To future students with a migrant background: only consider this program if you’re planning to do it with a friend. You’re unlikely to make many friends here, and you’ll probably end up feeling lonely and like an outsider, especially if your values or cultural background differ from the average “IDE” student. I’m now studying something else at a different university, and I’m much happier. I’m achieving great results and feel appreciated. Just to be clear: my review is not about TU Delft as a whole, it is specifically about the Industrial Design Engineering bachelor’s program. If you have any questions after reading my “mini-book,” feel free to send me a private message on Reddit or leave a comment under this post. I’m happy to help you make a better-informed study decision, something I, unfortunately, didn’t have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I just started Semester 2 at University of Huddersfield and I’m a student currently studying Applied Psychology on a 4 year course. I think most of the lecturers here are really kind and explain concepts very well. The pacing of assignments or tests is also good as there’s always plenty of time to meet deadlines. The student support team is also really great, as well as other amenities that are available on campus to support the students. We are also assigned a personal tutor with whom we can communicate about any issues. Overall, my experience so far at the University is basically perfect, lots of opportunities to meet new people as well which is fun.
Masinde Muliro university of science and technology has a system that defines and delivers expectations for students who have a passion for science and tech. It comprises a staff of positive-minded individuals towards education, who make the institution thrive in both academic and co-curricular activities. The university also has a support program for those who are unable to pay their tuition and fees thus transcending the barriers of illiteracy in the nation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
