University of Macedonia - UOM vs University of Piraeus - UNIPI vs Technological Educational Institute of Peloponnese - TEI vs College of Crete MBS vs Hellenic American College - HAEC

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Anatolia American University (5.00)
University of Macedonia - UOM: wins 0/7 categories
University of Piraeus - UNIPI: wins 0/7 categories
Technological Educational Institute of Peloponnese - TEI: wins 0/7 categories
College of Crete MBS: wins 0/7 categories
Hellenic American College - HAEC: wins 0/7 categories
Deree Graduate Education: wins 5/7 categories
Anatolia American University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: European and International Studies
Best programme: Economics
Heraklion, Greece
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: MA in Learning Design and Technology – Online
Thessaloniki, Greece
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Computing
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.00
Location
4.50
3.27
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.77
Win
4.00
Professors
4.00
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.59
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.13
3.08
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.65
Win
4.00
Student life
4.38
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
Win
4.50
Value
4.06
3.42
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.76
Win
4.50
Accommodation
2.94
3.18
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.36
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, market-connected, and up-to-date curricula with knowledgeable and helpful instructors.
  • +Supportive infrastructure and resources, including good facilities, a well-stocked library, and accessible teaching assistants.
  • +Opportunities for personal development, volunteering, and engaging in an international environment.
  • +Excellent professors and helpful staff.
  • +Well-organized programs and facilities.
  • +Engaging and flexible curriculum.
  • +Effective learning environment and resources.
  • +Engaging and informative teaching methods.
  • +Supportive and encouraging academic community.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, engaging programs with a balance of theory and practice
  • +Excellent faculty with practical experience and research expertise
  • +Supportive community and seamless institutional infrastructure
  • +Engaging classes and supportive professors
  • +Active campus life with study groups and clubs
  • +Stimulating multicultural environment and excellent facilities
Cons
  • -Insufficient theoretical and practical knowledge provided.
  • -Lack of practical application and outdated course content.
  • -Poor professor engagement and disconnect from industry needs.
  • -Inadequate facilities and administrative inefficiencies.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
  • -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor teaching quality and ineffective learning outcomes.
  • -Lack of structure and overwhelming course material.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, achieving a high score of 4.5, and in **student life**, with a rating of 4.36. Conversely, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, scoring a low 2.97. Other areas like professors and value for money also received favorable reviews, while facilities and internationality fell within the mid-range.

Across various aspects, the university demonstrates a range of strengths and areas for improvement. Professors received the highest rating at 3.75, indicating a strong performance in this area. Conversely, Internationality registered the lowest score with 3.08. Other evaluated categories such as Student Life (3.5) and Value (3.42) also scored well, while Facilities, Location, and Accomodation fell within the moderate range.

Across all surveyed categories, the university received a neutral rating of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses were identified in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The current data presents an even score across every aspect of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong feedback across multiple aspects. Notably, **Location** received the highest rating at approximately 4.83, followed closely by **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both around 4.73. **Value** also scored well at 4.75. The **Accomodation** rating, while still positive at 4.5, represents the comparatively weaker area among the surveyed categories.

This institution receives excellent marks across several key areas. Its accommodations and professor quality are particularly outstanding, both earning a perfect score. Student life and overall value are also highly rated. The university's facilities, location, and international appeal are strong, though these represent areas for potential improvement compared to its highest-scoring aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from 37 reviews, ~76% are positive, highlighting competent, helpful professors, market-connected courses, and good facilities. A single negative review (~3%) noted concerns about adequate theoretical and practical knowledge, though it acknowledged job opportunities.

Most reviews are positive (~74%), highlighting good professors, helpful staff, and excellent programs. Some students found it well-organized with great facilities. A few negative comments mentioned poor professor-student relationships and outdated course content.

This university receives highly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being positive. The average rating is 4/5 stars.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94%), with students praising academic depth, quality faculty, and valuable practical projects. A small percentage (~6%) express concerns about teaching quality and course content.

Both reviews were highly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students praised engaging classes, supportive professors, and vibrant campus life, with ~100% of feedback being positive.

Rating distribution
5★
27%
33%
0%
0%
0%
71%
100%
4★
49%
27%
100%
0%
0%
24%
0%
3★
22%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
7%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
1★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Computer Science

It is one of the best Universities in our country. It is organized, with many valuable teachers who can help you. Both in the office and in the class they are available to answer and explain all your questions. Sure, highly recommended to complete your bachelor's degree in computer science at the University of Piraeus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Excellent Value for Money MA TESOL

I did a lot of research before landing on ACG as my choice to do an MA TESOL programme. Firstly, I found the course very good value for money, especially as they offer the Trinity Cert embedded in the programme, a certificate which allows you to teach in most parts of the world. Secondly, I really appreciate the hybrid online

The multicultural environment

I think it should be considered one of the top institutions of Thessaloniki. The classes are engaging and the multicultural environment is very stimulating. The overall facilities are in excellent condition and the university is always willing to help the students excel.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close