Cukurova University vs Loyola Marymount University - LMU vs Horizons University vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT vs Arab Open University

Side-by-side comparison from 39 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Loyola Marymount University - LMU (4.50)
Cukurova University: wins 3/7 categories
Loyola Marymount University - LMU: wins 0/7 categories
Horizons University: wins 0/7 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/7 categories
Arab Open University: wins 4/7 categories
Achievers University - AUO: wins 0/7 categories
İskenderun Technical University ISTE - İSTE: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Los Angeles, California, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Paris, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bsc Information Technology
Best programme: Biomedical Engineering
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.51
Win
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
2.67
1.00
Location
4.93
Win
4.47
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
2.00
Professors
4.51
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
4.80
Win
3.33
1.50
Internationality
3.96
4.14
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Win
3.67
1.50
Student life
3.99
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Win
3.50
1.00
Value
3.96
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
1.50
Accommodation
4.20
Win
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
3.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality education and dedicated professors
  • +Supportive learning environment and active campus life
  • +Excellent campus facilities and beautiful surroundings
  • +Welcoming community and supportive professors
  • +Beautiful and engaging campus environment
  • +Smooth transition and strong academic experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible study programs balancing personal and professional life
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors with real-world focus
  • +Diverse student body and engaging university activities
  • +Engaging academics with close lecturer-student interaction
  • +Safe environment with extracurricular opportunities
  • +Strong emphasis on discipline and character development
  • +Dynamic learning, practical skills, and industry relevance
  • +Career preparation and real-world application focus
  • +Developing campus and academic strengths
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -High costs and lack of transparency are major concerns.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are common concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning in some departments.
  • -Limited industry connections are a drawback for career preparation.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional marks for its **Location**, with a near-perfect score. Facilities and Professors also stand out as strong points. Student Life, Internationality, and Value show moderate scores, representing areas that could be further enhanced. Accommodation received a solid rating, positioning it as a well-rounded university.

This university receives strong marks across most categories. Its location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, followed closely by facilities. Student life and professors also garnered positive feedback. Accommodations represent the lowest-rated area, with internationality and value falling somewhere in between. The university demonstrates a solid overall performance with particular strengths in its surroundings and infrastructure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Academic excellence shines through with professors receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, alongside internationality and value for money. Location and accommodation, while still positive, represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still solid, scores. This indicates a generally strong offering with particular strengths in teaching quality.

This university's value for money is a standout strength, earning a perfect 4. Internationality and student life also received positive marks, both above 3.5. Conversely, the facilities are a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors and accommodation are rated moderately.

The university demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Its weakest areas are facilities and student life, both receiving a rating of 1. Conversely, its strongest areas include location and accommodation, each scoring a 2. Internationality and value are rated moderately at 1.5, along with the professors.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.13 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive, highlighting quality education, dedicated professors, a supportive environment, and active campus life. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.48/5 from 21 reviews, ~90% highlight positive experiences. Students praise the stunning campus, strong community, and supportive professors, noting a smooth transition and enjoyable academic environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students highlight program flexibility and supportive professors. Some minor points mention less active student activities and occasional exam concerns.

With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, ~67% are positive. Students highlight growth, academic improvement, and a great learning experience with engaging lecturers and opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, feedback on İskenderun Technical University is split, with positive points highlighting practical learning and career preparation, while negative feedback mentions outdated equipment and administrative issues.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
57%
0%
0%
60%
0%
50%
4★
38%
33%
0%
0%
20%
67%
0%
3★
25%
10%
0%
0%
20%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close