Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Rovira i Virgili University - URV vs Cesda Flight School
Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +High-quality, research-oriented academics and teaching
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +Excellent location with good facilities and international opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Practical, real-world learning and projects
- +Strong professor guidance and international connections
- +Personalized support and career development
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated and unengaging teaching staff negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Course content and structure are often poorly designed and disorganized.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors and staff is a common complaint.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
This institution garners its highest marks for its **Professors** (4.02) and **Value** (3.80). Areas showing moderate performance include **Student Life** (3.72), **Internationality** (3.75), and **Facilities** (3.68). Its lowest-rated aspects are **Location** (3.40) and **Accomodation** (3.45), suggesting these are the primary areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Student Life** is also highly rated. The **weakest areas**, while still strong, are **Accommodations** and **Location**. Overall, the university presents a commendable academic and social environment, with value and internationality also receiving positive marks.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
Around 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting rigorous programs, cooperative teachers, and convenient facilities. A small percentage of feedback notes administrative inefficiency and outdated teaching.
Nothing to show
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.92/5. Students highlight the practical, human, and international nature of the program, valuing real projects, professor connections, and career support. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
