Escola d'Art i Disseny de Tarragona - EADT vs Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira - UTP vs Sumy State University vs Tallinn University of Applied Sciences vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM
Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Enhanced career prospects and professional development abroad
- +Expanded global perspective and architectural vision
- +High-quality academic programs and excellent professors
- +Beautiful and well-equipped campus with ample student opportunities
- +Positive learning environment with great minds and personal growth potential
- +Understanding and supportive teachers
- +Strong academic programs and knowledge acquisition
- +Positive campus environment and affordability
- +High-quality education with practical skills focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with good remote options and activities
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Skill acquisition for career and future
- +Project support from lecturers
- +Desire for degree-level programs
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -The curriculum lacks practicality and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.
- -Insufficient practical training and overwhelming theory.
- -Irrelevant or excessive coursework, including unnecessary national language and history.
- -Poor communication, administrative issues, and perceived financial exploitation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The teaching quality and curriculum are often criticized for being uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in **internationality** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores. Its academic core also shines, with **professors** earning a high rating of 4. However, the university's **facilities** present a significant area for improvement, scoring a low 1. Student life and accommodation are rated moderately well, while the location is also a point of moderate concern.
With excellent scores across several key areas, this institution shines particularly bright in terms of **Location**, earning a near-perfect 4.83. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received strong marks at 4.5. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, while **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still respectable, rating of 3.83.
Considering a university's strengths and weaknesses, location stands out as a particularly strong aspect, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation appears to be the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Other aspects such as facilities, professors, student life, and internationality fall within a moderate range, indicating a balanced performance across these categories.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors receive a near-perfect score of 4.75, with facilities, location, and student life also scoring highly at 4.25 and 4.5 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3. Internationality also presents an opportunity for growth at 3.75, while the overall value is rated a solid 4.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
Academic excellence and international appeal are clear strengths, evidenced by high ratings for professors (4.5) and internationality (4). The university also scores well in location (4) and value (4.5). However, areas such as facilities, student life, and accommodation received more moderate scores of 3, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. The sole reviewer highlights its significant career benefits and ability to broaden professional vision. Negative feedback is negligible.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise the beautiful campus, excellent professors, strong academic programs (especially engineering), and numerous student opportunities.
~67% of reviews are positive, praising understanding teachers and good learning experiences. ~33% are negative, citing insufficient practical training and irrelevant coursework.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality education, practical skills, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and engaging activities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, the 2 reviews were entirely positive. Students highlighted lectures' assistance with projects and skill acquisition for future careers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It's not a university but it's a training ground to acquire skills for a purpose and future. What I like about this is Lectures are always ready to assist students to undertake projects which enhance their ability. What I dislike about the school is students are being stressed with series of projects with limited time.
Nothing to show