Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV vs Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE vs Universidad Santa Maria - USM vs Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP vs Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar

Side-by-side comparison from 49 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH (4.30)
Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela - UBV: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Experimental de Las Artes - UNEARTE: wins 2/5 categories
Universidad Santa Maria - USM: wins 1/5 categories
Instituto Universitario de Nuevas Profesiones - IUNP: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Católica Santa Rosa - Ucsar: wins 2/5 categories
Universidad Alejandro de Humboldt - UAH: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Politécnica Territorial José Antonio Anzoátegui - UPTJAA: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Win
3.92
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.00
3.83
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
4.00
4.20
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
4.00
3.95
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
5.00
Win
4.03
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.00
5.00
3.70
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
2.93
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified teachers and pleasant student environment
  • +Good facilities and safety
  • +Easy access to university
  • +Focus on artistic preparation and free experimentation
  • +Emphasis on community and social artistic experience
  • +Offers diverse degree options for artistic readiness
  • +Excellent professors and academic staff
  • +Good facilities and resources
  • +Practical learning opportunities and patient access

Nothing to show

  • +Affordable tuition fees
  • +Relevant and updated curricula
  • +Excellent academic programs and dedicated professors
  • +Strong career preparation and professional development
  • +Opportunities for practical application and societal contribution

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Lack of teacher engagement and support for student understanding.
  • -Outdated digital infrastructure and difficulty accessing information.
  • -Perceived low academic standards and a focus on quantity over quality.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a major problem.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and poor communication are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Demonstrating a consistently high performance, this institution received uniform scores of 4 out of 5 across all evaluated aspects. No specific category emerged as a standout strength or weakness, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all achieving equal recognition. This suggests a well-rounded and uniformly positive university experience.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. It also performs well in **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, each rated at 4. **Location** and **Professors** are also strong points, each earning a 4. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with standout strengths in its physical environment and student experience.

Academic strengths emerge prominently, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.2. Student Life and Internationality also score well, reflecting positive campus experiences and a global outlook. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.93. Facilities and Value are moderately rated, suggesting room for improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Value for money** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** are identified as areas for potential improvement, each scoring a moderate three out of five. **Professors** and **internationality** fall in the middle range, indicating a solid but not exceptional performance in these aspects.

Across all evaluated aspects, the institution presents a uniform score of zero. This indicates no particular strengths or weaknesses emerge from the provided ratings. The consistent lack of points suggests a complete absence of positive or negative feedback in the categories of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers and facilities, alongside a pleasant and safe environment. There is minimal negative feedback regarding administrative processes.

The single review highlights strong preparation in all art areas and community participation. Free experimentation and practice in workshops are noted positively. The university fosters readiness to become an artist.

Approximately 74% of 40 reviews are positive, highlighting good professors and facilities. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions teacher disengagement and outdated online resources.

Nothing to show

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4/5. Positive comments highlight satisfactory distance learning options and reasonable tuition fees.

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~74% of reviews are positive. Students praise the varied curriculum and academic level, with some suggestions for salary increases and improved student union involvement.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
0%
4★
100%
100%
23%
0%
100%
25%
0%
3★
0%
0%
23%
0%
0%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

One of the best

I can consider that it is one of the best universities in Venezuela, good functioning of the facilities and excellent teachers. Incredible environment to develop and very good areas for students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close