Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universitat d'Alacant vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA vs C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S
Side-by-side comparison from 195 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Beautiful, convenient, and well-equipped campus with natural elements.
- +Kind, passionate, and supportive teachers fostering good student relationships.
- +Positive student atmosphere with engaging activities and a welcoming city.
- +Strong academic and research support
- +Interdisciplinary and research-oriented programs
- +Modern facilities and collaborative environment
- +Professional, involved faculty and familiar atmosphere
- +Diverse design program offerings
- +Potential for improvement in facilities and organization
- +Engaging and practical curriculum with real business case studies.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty fostering career readiness.
- +Diverse and international learning environment with strong staff support.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Inadequate academic training and poor teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including retroactive law application.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities negatively impacting campus life.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic programs and limited practical application.
- -Administrative & management issues.
- -Lack of support and unhelpful staff.
- -Unmet promises regarding internships.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest attribute, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other evaluated aspects, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, all fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with its **Facilities** standing out as the highest-rated area. Student Life, Professors, and Internationality also receive strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. While Location and Value are rated moderately well, improvements in the accommodation sector could significantly enhance the student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a comfortable and well-equipped environment. However, the location is a significant weakness, scoring only one out of five, and professor quality, while decent, is the lowest-rated academic aspect.
This university garners exceptional praise for its professors, achieving a high rating of 4.62. Internationality and location also received strong scores, both above 4.4. Student life and value are well-regarded at 4.3. Facilities are rated at 4.03. The lowest-scoring area is accommodation, with a rating of 3.71.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 63 reviews, ~86% praise the beautiful, convenient campus and friendly, passionate teachers. A small ~5% of feedback points to concerns about teaching quality and exam structure.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~74%) for academic and research support, interdisciplinary programs, and a conducive environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) of reviews mention some limitations in campus facilities.
With a 3.25 average rating, most (around 75%) student feedback is positive, highlighting professional teachers and a good learning experience. However, about 25% of reviews mention significant issues with outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
Nearly all reviews are positive (~93%), highlighting knowledgeable, supportive lecturers and practical, well-structured courses in a welcoming, international environment. A few (~5%) noted inconsistent staff helpfulness and lack of internship support.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
