Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad de Málaga vs Escuela Superior de Arte Dramático de Málaga
Side-by-side comparison from 118 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Strong practical focus with real-world brand experience
- +Supportive teachers and excellent campus facilities/resources
- +Diverse, multicultural student body and environment
- +Supportive and engaging professors
- +Positive campus atmosphere and student life
- +Solid academic programs and practical learning
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistent complaints.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for many students.
- -Unmotivated teachers and difficulty of studies.
- -Lack of practical knowledge and real-world focus in degrees.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This university garners exceptionally high marks in internationality, boasting a rating of 4.65. Facilities also received strong acclaim at 4.56, closely followed by professors at 4.53 and value at 4.48. The student experience is well-regarded, with a 4.35 rating for student life. Location and accommodation represent the areas with the lowest scores, both falling in the upper 3-point range.
Evaluations reveal the university excels in **Student Life**, achieving the highest score, and is also highly regarded for **Location** and **Internationality**. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other metrics, including **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value**, fall within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With ~94% positive sentiment, reviews highlight enriching theoretical and practical skills, multicultural environments, and helpful teachers. Some noted the campus is a bit far from the city. No negative feedback was reported.
The university garners a 3.74 rating, with ~74% of 57 reviews being positive, highlighting solid academics, good professors, and campus atmosphere. A small ~3.5% of feedback cited unmotivated teachers or impractical degrees.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
It is a university that brings together many exchange students, you could say more than 700 people. Therefore there is the possibility of generating an approach with different cultures and meeting people. The problem is that the university does not understand that a foreign person does not know anything about the university and they should provide information regarding all types, explaining how the schedules are chosen, what the internship process is like, what apps or websites they use, etc. .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
