State University Of Surabaya - UNESA vs Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya vs Widya Mandala Catholic University - - vs Darma Cendika Catholic University - UKDC vs Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
State University Of Surabaya - UNESA: wins 0/0 categories
Dinamika University - Stikom Surabaya: wins 0/0 categories
Widya Mandala Catholic University - -: wins 0/0 categories
Darma Cendika Catholic University - UKDC: wins 0/0 categories
Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya: wins 0/0 categories
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya: wins 0/0 categories
Universitas Ciputra Surabaya: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Best programme: English Literature
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Tax Accounting
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Location
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Student life
4.25
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
3.75
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible education and personalized course guidance
  • +Supportive environment with caring professors and engaging teaching methods
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular activities and hands-on experience

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers.
  • +Excellent facilities and learning environment.
  • +Strong academic programs and practical exposure.

Nothing to show

  • +Intelligent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong business and management programs
  • +Esteemed reputation in East Java

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities and supportive mentors
  • +Friendly student environment and fun atmosphere
  • +Entrepreneurship focus across all programs
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a persistent problem.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes create significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for students.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and ineffective curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Course content is irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

With a robust average score, the university demonstrates particular strengths in **Student Life** (4.25) and **Location** (4). Ratings for **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Professors** are also solid at 3.75. **Value** is well-regarded at 4. The **Facilities** category, while still decent, received the lowest score at 3.25.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional scores in all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all received perfect marks. Likewise, the university offers outstanding value for its students. With a flawless 5/5 rating in every category, there are no discernible weak areas; the university excels uniformly across its offerings.

Nothing to show

This institution garners perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all assessed areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received the highest possible rating. Given this uniform excellence, there are no standout strongest or weakest areas, as every aspect appears to be exceptionally strong.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback, excelling with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Accommodations, Internationality, and Value. Student Life, while still strong with a score of 4, represents the sole area not achieving a top rating. Overall, the university demonstrates widespread strengths with this one minor area for potential enhancement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting excellent and accessible education, supportive professors, and engaging teaching methods. Students appreciate guidance in course selection and opportunities for deep engagement. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, resulting in a 5/5 average rating and ~0% negative feedback. Students highlight rewarding academic programs, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and excellent facilities. The university is also recognized for its strong ranking.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). The positive feedback highlights intelligent professors and a comprehensive curriculum, with a specific recommendation for the money and business management major.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, reviews highlight excellent facilities, a friendly student environment, and supportive mentors. The university's focus on entrepreneurship and innovation is also noted positively. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close