Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences vs University College Roosevelt - UCR
Side-by-side comparison from 238 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive faculty
- +Diverse and international campus environment with ample extracurricular opportunities
- +Balance of theory and practical application in studies
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Ample opportunities for personal growth and industry immersion
- +Small university feel with engaged professors and students
- +Rigorous liberal arts academic program
- +Opportunity to make a community impact
- +Industry-relevant teaching and hands-on experience
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities
- +Strong friendships formed
- +Practical, real-world focus
- +International and diverse community
- +Supportive, close-knit environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher availability lead to students feeling unsupported and left to self-teach.
- -Widespread disorganization and unclear assignments create confusion and hinder academic progress.
- -Inconsistent feedback, or a complete lack thereof, makes it difficult for students to understand their performance and areas for improvement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment that hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction diminishes academic value.
Offering a well-rounded experience, this institution excels in **Internationality**, boasting a score of 4.45, closely followed by **Professors** at 4.30 and **Location** at 4.30. **Student Life** and **Value** also received positive marks. The primary area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution scores exceptionally well in Facilities and Internationality, indicating a robust environment for students and a global outlook. Student Life and Location also receive strong marks. Conversely, the areas of Professors and Accomodation present the weakest performance, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Value for money is rated reasonably well.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly in **location, student life, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving a perfect 5. Professors are also highly regarded, earning another 5. The primary area for improvement lies in its **facilities**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Accommodation also scores well at 4.
With exceptional scores in nearly every aspect, this institution shines brightly. Areas of strength are overwhelmingly positive, with perfect ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value. The primary area for potential improvement lies in Accomodation, which received a more moderate score.
This institution receives outstanding marks across most aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and overall value are all rated at a near-perfect 4.67. Internationality stands out as a perfect 5. Accommodations, while still strong, are the lowest rated category at 4.33, representing the sole area for potential improvement.
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 57 reviews, ~91% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the multicultural environment, engaging academic programs, and valuable campus resources like the library and modern facilities. No negative reviews were provided.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. About 6% of reviews mention disorganization, poor communication, and lack of support.
Based on one review, the university is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights small class sizes, professor-student engagement, and a dynamic academic environment. No negative reviews were provided.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This feedback highlights first-class teaching, facilities, and opportunities, with modules taught by industry leaders providing real-life experience.
All 3 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight practical, real-world project experience and an international environment. The program is seen as future-focused and impactful.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
When I decided to look into international schools (as an American), I never expected I could find a university like this one. I love the closeness of this small university, the engagement of the professors and students to create dynamic classroom environments, and the feeling that I can make a difference in my community. The academic program is very rigorous and upholds a liberal arts
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
