Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Breda University of Applied Sciences vs NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 244 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and supportive professors
- +Diverse and international student environment
- +Balanced theory and practical application in programmes
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Strong industry-relevant skill development and career preparation.
- +Supportive and professional faculty guidance.
- +Opportunities for creativity and broad learning.
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
- +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community
- +Ample opportunities for personal growth and industry immersion
- +Practical, hands-on learning with industry-relevant lecturers
- +Broad program offering diverse career paths post-graduation
- +Engaging real-world business case applications
- +Internship and study abroad opportunities
- +Strong career prospects and networking
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear career relevance and transferability of skills.
- -Programmatic issues, including misleading international focus and language barriers.
- -Poor communication and lack of teacher availability lead to students feeling unsupported and left to self-teach.
- -Widespread disorganization and unclear assignments create confusion and hinder academic progress.
- -Inconsistent feedback, or a complete lack thereof, makes it difficult for students to understand their performance and areas for improvement.
- -Outdated systems and administrative issues
- -Poor quality and unreliable teaching delivery
- -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor learning resources are frequently criticized.
- -A lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring complaint.
This university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.46. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.31, alongside a positive showing for Location and Value. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.15.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in Location, receiving a perfect score. Facilities also fare well, with a rating of 3.86. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.14. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution scores exceptionally well in Facilities and Internationality, indicating a robust environment for students and a global outlook. Student Life and Location also receive strong marks. Conversely, the areas of Professors and Accomodation present the weakest performance, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Value for money is rated reasonably well.
This university demonstrates a solid performance in its **facilities and professors**, both scoring a respectable 3.67. The **student life and value** also receive a decent rating of 3.33. However, the **accommodation and location** stand out as weaker areas, receiving the lowest scores. Internationality is rated moderately at 3.0.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its vibrant student life, earning a perfect score, and its convenient location, which is rated highly at 4.5. Conversely, areas requiring attention include the quality of professors and accommodation, both receiving a middle-of-the-road 3. Facilities and internationality also fall into this moderate range. The overall value proposition sits at a respectable 3.5.
With a high average rating of 4.3/5 from 56 reviews, ~89% of students praise the university's multicultural environment, excellent library resources, and dedicated professors. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Around 57% of reviews are positive, highlighting skill development and professional support. However, about 29% of feedback points to program content not meeting expectations and limited career preparation.
Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. About 6% of reviews mention disorganization, poor communication, and lack of support.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting hands-on learning and practical lecturers. One negative review mentions outdated systems and unreliable lectures. The average rating is 3/5.
With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlighting program length, internship opportunities, study abroad options, and strong career prospects. No negative feedback was provided.
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Very flexible in what you can choose, but the course can be very vague and push you into the marketing or film track. Other specializations don't get as many options for the graduation project. There are also some very passionate and good teachers at the school, but sometimes classes don't really follow with what you need to know for the deliverable
Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.
I’ve been studying at AMSIB for 3 years now. Almost 2 years were online studying due to COVID so I will share my experience considering most of the study up till now was online. I did start this year going to campus again. The program overall is pretty general. That makes the program pretty attractive to anybody because you can go to so many different fields after graduating. There is a possibility to do a major and to specialise in a field you like. However, the selection is pretty small (only 6 different majors) so that could be a point for improvement. The building of the school is located pretty far from the city centre and is placed next to a shopping area. As a result, there is not a lot to do around so most students just go home after. It’s a shame cause socialising is very important for us students. The school itself does not initiate a lot of social activities/ events which I think is a shame as well. The quality of the classes and the range of courses are pretty good. Some courses I would have to preferred to skip but most courses are a good pick. I really feel after 3 years that I gained so much knowledge about the business world and everything around it. The communication between students and teachers should be better. The communication goes through email and is very slow. Teachers should be more involved in my opinion. Diversity and inclusivity are also pretty impressive. However, the students should be more spread out between classes cause many classes are mostly Dutch students which counteracts the whole international environment idea. To finish, I would recommend the program as students gain enough knowledge by the time they want to choose a major which makes more students pursue their desired career path. I feel the school is working a lot on improving itself and its courses so I think it’s on the right path.
Nothing to show
