Universidad Europea - UE vs Lisbon Accounting and Business School - ISCAL vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics vs Nova School of Social Sciences and Humanities - FCSH vs Universidade Lusófona
Side-by-side comparison from 171 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Dedicated and expert faculty
- +Practical and engaging curriculum
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities
- +Challenging academics and high expectations.
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty.
- +Flexible programs and career-focused education.
- +Supportive learning environment and approachable, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Strong humanities and social sciences programmes with engaging course content
- +Diverse international community and vibrant city location
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Positive campus atmosphere and facilities
- +Inspiring and creative learning environment with practical, project-based education
- +Supportive and experienced faculty bringing real-world insights
- +Modern facilities and active student life promoting personal growth
- +Welcoming international community & diverse backgrounds
- +Interactive flipped classroom & engaging discussions
- +Approachable professors & personal development focus
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance significantly detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of student support and engagement opportunities are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical, work-related learning.
- -No accommodation provided.
- -Administrative and communication issues
- -Poor teaching quality and grading
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of organization and poor event management.
- -Apathetic and unhelpful professors, inadequate teaching, and self-teaching required.
- -Unprofessional and rude faculty, and an inconsistent curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. Professors, location, and value all received exceptionally high marks, suggesting excellent academic and practical offerings. Student life and internationality also scored well, indicating a vibrant and globally-minded campus. The weakest areas appear to be facilities and accommodation, which, while still positive, scored lower than other categories.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors**, earning a high rating, and also scores well in **Location** and **Internationality**. While **Student Life** and **Facilities** are generally positive, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university also offers good **Value**, reflecting a well-rounded profile with specific areas for potential enhancement.
This university performs exceptionally well in **location**, scoring the highest at 4.52. **Internationality** and **student life** also receive strong marks, above 4.1. Conversely, **accommodation** is the lowest-rated area at 3.12. While **professors** and **facilities** receive solid mid-range scores around 3.7 to 4, the overall picture suggests a vibrant student experience with some room for improvement in housing.
Overall, the institution receives a mixed but generally positive rating. Location stands out as the strongest aspect, achieving a perfect score. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Internationality and value for money are areas where improvement could be beneficial, as they receive the same middling score.
This university scores highest for its excellent **Location**, with a rating of 4.17. **Professors** also receive positive marks at 3.69. The university's **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are areas for improvement, both scoring a modest 3.08 and 3 respectively. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated moderately, falling between 3.4 and 3.5. Its **Value** is also rated at 3.
Overall, the university receives strong marks across various aspects. Professors and location are particularly lauded, achieving the highest scores. Student life and internationality also perform well. While accommodation is rated slightly lower, the university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and value, with no significantly weak areas identified.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
Nearly all reviews are positive, ~89%, highlighting exceptional and supportive professors and practical, engaging programs. Excellent facilities and industry opportunities are also recurring themes.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students highlight excellent academic rigor, outstanding teaching quality with knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a strong learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
With a 4.05/5 average rating from 21 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, praising the university's care for students, knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, and supportive academic environment in social sciences and humanities. A small amount of feedback noted a focus on theory over practical application.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic campus atmosphere, engaging classes, and helpful teachers. A small portion of negative feedback mentions issues with international student support and outdated facilities.
About 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring environments and creative learning. A smaller portion, around 15%, criticizes poor organization and lack of professor support.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100%), highlighting the welcoming international community and engaging, interactive teaching methods. Professors are approachable, and opportunities like double degrees are appreciated. No negative feedback was recorded.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university is very inclusive.Everybody is the same, no matter age, race, gender, sexuality, style etc... This inclusivity also makes the atmosphere in the faculty great! Every break there is someone playing music, singing, drinking and smoking (responsibly) The teachers are also very nice. The classes are always relaxed and we even get a few laughs.
We pay a lot and we don´t have the best conditions. We have good teachers but there are a lot of teachers that are not that good at teaching and don´t give the best grades. The computers are old and it´s difficult to work with them.
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
