Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Colegio Nacional de Educación Profesional Técnica - CONALEP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study schedules and efficient degree completion
- +Good teaching quality and career-focused outcomes
- +Adequate study facilities and convenient campus structure
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Accessible and competent teachers
- +Career relevance and job opportunities
- +Personal and academic development
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Inconsistent teaching quality
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Lack of variety in food options and insufficient library resources.
- -Poor distribution and organization of school spaces.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Location (4.75) and Professors (4.475). Student Life and Facilities also receive strong marks. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Accomodation (2.625) and Internationality (2.6), suggesting these aspects may require considerable improvement for prospective students. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with room for growth.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Assessing the provided data, the university demonstrates particular strengths in its **location** (4.4) and **professors** and **value** (both 4.2). Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a significantly lower rating of 2.6. Other aspects like **student life** and **internationality** fall within a moderate range.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
With a ~4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include appreciation for useful academic programs and flexible scheduling. No negative reviews were submitted.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 26 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising accessible teachers and career opportunities. One negative review (~4%) mentioned a lack of variety in food and a small library.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
