Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad en Línea - UTEL vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Anáhuac (4.60)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad en Línea - UTEL: wins 0/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Tres Culturas - UTC : wins 0/7 categories
UCAD University - UCAD : wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Cancun, Mexico
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
34 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Mexico City, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.52
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.52
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.42
Win
4.33
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.90
4.61
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Student life
4.24
4.64
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Value
4.59
4.64
Win
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
3.64
4.67
Win
3.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
  • +Expert professors and practical career knowledge
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Valuable skill development and enriching experience

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
  • +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
  • +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and insufficient support hinder learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its location and professors are particularly well-regarded, receiving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation emerges as the weakest point, scoring lowest among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like facilities, student life, internationality, and value are rated moderately, suggesting areas for potential improvement while maintaining a generally positive standing.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight qualified professors and a positive online learning experience, including acquiring career-relevant knowledge and reinforcing computer skills. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
68%
67%
0%
50%
0%
0%
4★
30%
38%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
18%
3%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close