Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School vs Ironhack
Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable professors
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs and academic excellence
- +Strong sense of community and comprehensive student development
- +Quality teaching and accessible mentors
- +Flexible study options for working students
- +Supportive environment and engaging classes
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
- +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
- +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues create constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world application.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Student Life** also stands out with a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** represent the weaker areas, scoring the lowest. Other aspects like Professors, Location, and Internationality are rated favorably, indicating a well-rounded experience with specific areas for potential improvement.
This institution received outstanding scores for Location, scoring an impressive 4.86, and Student Life, with a strong 4.75. Professors also garnered high marks at 4.56. Areas for potential improvement include Internationality, which received the lowest rating at 3.78. Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were all rated a solid 4.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students praising excellent teachers, good facilities, and comprehensive study programs. A small amount of feedback (~17%) indicated minor issues with bathrooms.
Six positive reviews highlight good programs, accessible teachers, and flexible study options. These students appreciated mentor quality and support for those balancing work and study. No negative feedback was provided.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.
