Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad Tecnológica de México - UNITEC vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
- +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
- +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
- +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Innovative programs and focus on student development
- +Quality professors with relevant industry experience
- +Flexible programs supporting work-study balance
- +Supportive environment and accessible education
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Excellent teachers and well-maintained facilities
- +Flexible scheduling and convenient location options
- +User-friendly platform and diverse payment choices
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
- -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
- -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources negatively impact learning.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Inefficient administrative and management practices cause frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors.
A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.
Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.
This university demonstrates a strong academic and social environment, with notable strengths in Professors (4.6), Location (4.625), and Student Life (4.55). Facilities also score well at 4.3, contributing to a positive student experience. However, areas for development include Accomodation (3.875) and Internationality (3.7), representing the lowest-rated aspects among the surveyed categories. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This university's facilities stand out with an excellent rating of 4.5. Professors and student life also received solid scores of 4. Areas like location and accommodation are rated favorably at 4. The university's internationality and value propositions are its weakest points, both scoring 3.5.
With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.
~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 11 reviews, ~74% are positive. Students appreciate the quality of professors and flexible study programs. There is no negative feedback.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, functional facilities, and an interactive platform. Convenient payment options and flexible schedules are also highlighted.
Nothing to show
If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
