Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX vs Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad Anáhuac vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 82 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela de Diseño del Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes - EDINBA (5.00)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Mexicana - UNIMEX: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/4 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 0/4 categories
Escuela de Diseño del Instituto Nacional de Bellas Artes - EDINBA: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture and Civil Engineering
Best programme: Global Law
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Communication
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Creative Advertising
Category ratings
Facilities
3.69
4.13
3.55
4.52
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Location
4.20
4.75
3.50
4.52
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.10
4.48
3.10
4.42
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
3.90
2.60
2.08
4.61
Win
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Student life
4.24
4.15
2.88
4.64
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
4.59
4.15
3.14
4.64
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.64
2.63
2.13
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
  • +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
  • +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
  • +Flexible study schedules and efficient degree completion
  • +Good teaching quality and career-focused outcomes
  • +Adequate study facilities and convenient campus structure
  • +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
  • +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Innovative programs and focus on student development
  • +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
  • +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
  • +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
  • +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
  • +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality
  • -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
  • -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
  • -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, particularly excelling in Location (4.75) and Professors (4.475). Student Life and Facilities also receive strong marks. However, significant weaknesses are evident in Accomodation (2.625) and Internationality (2.6), suggesting these aspects may require considerable improvement for prospective students. Overall, the university offers a compelling experience with room for growth.

Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.

This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.

With a ~4/5 average rating, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Recurring themes include appreciation for useful academic programs and flexible scheduling. No negative reviews were submitted.

~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.

University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
52%
40%
57%
68%
0%
50%
100%
4★
30%
20%
14%
38%
0%
0%
0%
3★
18%
40%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
29%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Worst option, awful professors and service

If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Interdisciplinary and cutting-edge perspective

EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close