University of California Los Angeles - UCLA vs University of Southern California - USC vs Los Angeles Valley College - LAVC vs Hospitality Academy vs Mount Saint Mary University

Side-by-side comparison from 151 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of California Los Angeles - UCLA: wins 1/4 categories
University of Southern California - USC: wins 0/4 categories
Los Angeles Valley College - LAVC: wins 0/4 categories
Hospitality Academy: wins 0/4 categories
Mount Saint Mary University: wins 0/4 categories
Musician's Institute: wins 2/4 categories
Meridian University: wins 1/4 categories
Comparing
Los Angeles, California, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
96 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Los Angeles, California, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
48 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication
Los Angeles, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Barcelona, Spain
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Los Angeles, California, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Counselling Psychology
Los Angeles, California, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Music
Los Angeles, California, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.46
4.49
Not rated
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.42
4.48
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
5.00
Win
Professors
4.47
4.71
Not rated
3.33
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.17
4.15
Not rated
3.67
5.00
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.34
4.35
Not rated
3.67
4.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Value
4.27
4.19
Not rated
3.33
5.00
4.50
5.00
Accommodation
4.22
Win
4.15
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and passionate professors
  • +Strong academic programs and career development resources
  • +Vibrant and connected campus community
  • +Career readiness and opportunities
  • +Supportive and academic community
  • +Engaging learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible courses & supportive teachers
  • +Career advancement & internship opportunities
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +Individual student focus and professors fostering strengths in differences
  • +Industry-professional instructors and mentors
  • +Practical, real-world music industry knowledge
  • +State-of-the-art facilities and equipment
  • +exceptional, supportive faculty
  • +transformative, holistic program approach
  • +intellectual rigor and personal growth
Cons
  • -Poor course structure and content quality.
  • -Ineffective teaching and support.
  • -Administrative and facilities issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated course content and lack of practical training.
  • -Poor communication and a feeling of being scammed.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations.
  • -Overcrowded and uninspired learning environments.
  • -Inflexible and unaccommodating policies.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
Rating summary
What students say

Remarkably high marks are evident across several key university metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving scores above 4.46. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, though still rated positively, is accommodation, with a score of 4.22. Internationality, while solid, is also among the lower-rated categories.

Consistently strong performance across all assessed aspects, this university shines particularly in its faculty, earning an impressive 4.71 rating. Student life and facilities also received high marks, reflecting a positive academic environment. Accommodation and internationality, while still favorable, are areas where there is room for slight improvement compared to other categories, with ratings around 4.15. The overall value is also rated well at 4.19.

Nothing to show

A review of this university reveals a mixed but generally positive assessment. Its strongest areas are Student Life and Internationality, both scoring around 3.67. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation received a solid 3, while Professors and Value landed slightly higher at approximately 3.33.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Its **Value** is also highly rated. While other areas like **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** all perform well with solid 4-star ratings, these represent the university's most balanced and slightly less outstanding aspects compared to its top-tier performance in teaching quality and global engagement.

This institution garners outstanding marks in facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and location are also highly rated at 4.5. Accommodation stands as the relatively weakest area, scoring a 4, though still representing a solid offering. Overall, the university presents a very strong academic and experiential profile.

This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~94% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.27/5, students praise high quality education, approachable professors, and strong career development resources. Minimal negative feedback was reported.

With ~98% positive feedback from 48 reviews and an average rating of 4.15/5, students praise career preparation and academic ambition. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.67/5 from 3 reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is positive, highlighting career advancement, internships, and effective teaching. About 33% of feedback expressed disappointment with communication and outdated course content.

With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights personalized student focus and professors encouraging individual strengths. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight incredible teachers, industry professionals providing practical knowledge, and a supportive environment for musical growth. Negative feedback is approximately 0%.

With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
32%
17%
0%
67%
0%
100%
100%
4★
63%
81%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
5%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

I wish I could leave a positive review, but...

I genuinely wish I could leave a positive review about Hospitality Academy, but unfortunately, my experience has been incredibly disappointing and feels like a scam. They promised a hospitality certificate program with proper classes and training. I attended the first class, and after that—nothing. No follow-up, no new classes, and the content they provided was completely outdated, with videos from as far back as 2008. What’s worse is the complete lack of communication. I’ve reached out more than ten times via email and received no response. I also contacted my supposed advisor multiple times, and again—nothing. This level of unprofessionalism is unacceptable, especially from a company claiming to help professionals grow in the hospitality industry. I do not recommend this program to anyone. If you're serious about your education, go directly with accredited universities. It will save you time, money, and a lot of frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close