University of Nairobi vs University of Eldoret vs Chuka University - Chuka uni vs Sigma Academy vs Bridge College

Side-by-side comparison from 268 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Graffins College (5.00)
University of Nairobi: wins 0/7 categories
University of Eldoret: wins 0/7 categories
Chuka University - Chuka uni: wins 0/7 categories
Sigma Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/7 categories
KIRIRI Women's University of Science and Technology - KWUST: wins 0/7 categories
Graffins College: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Applied Statistics and Programming
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Nairobi, Kenya
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Software Development
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.41
4.26
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Location
4.61
4.71
4.21
Not rated
Not rated
3.33
5.00
Win
Professors
4.38
4.39
4.44
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.18
4.28
3.60
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
5.00
Win
Student life
4.21
4.53
4.48
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
4.40
4.67
4.48
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.75
4.31
4.38
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic reputation and employability.
  • +Quality of teaching and knowledgeable, supportive lecturers.
  • +Convenient location and diverse learning environment.
  • +Supportive and devoted lecturers
  • +Opportunities for innovation and career growth
  • +Positive campus environment and diverse student body
  • +Strong academic foundation and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and approachable lecturers
  • +Positive learning environment and personal growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Empowering and supportive academic environment
  • +Personalized attention and approachable lecturers
  • +Strong focus on key disciplines for women
  • +Practical and engaging teaching methods
  • +Friendly and supportive facilitators
Cons
  • -Overcrowding negatively impacts the learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure need improvement.
  • -Overemphasis on theory neglects practical skills development.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are disappointing.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, the university demonstrates a generally strong performance. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, receiving a score of 4.61. Professors and value also score highly, both above 4.39. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.75. Other categories like facilities, student life, and internationality fall within a solid mid-range, all exceeding 4.0.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **location** (4.71) and **value** (4.67), indicating these are key strengths. **Student life** also scores well at 4.53. The **facilities** (4.41), **professors** (4.39), and **accommodation** (4.31) are all rated positively. The area with the lowest score, though still respectable, is **internationality** (4.28).

This university garners impressive scores in several key areas. Student Life and Value both stand out with perfect marks, complemented by strong ratings for Professors and Accomodation. Facilities and Location also receive favorable reviews. The weakest area identified is Internationality, which received a notably lower score compared to the other metrics.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving outstanding scores. Student life and accommodation are also rated positively. However, the university's location receives a moderate rating, and its internationality is a noted area for improvement, scoring significantly lower than other categories.

This institution garners excellent scores across the board. All aspects, from its impressive facilities and highly-rated professors to its vibrant student life and advantageous location, received a perfect 5. Accommodation and internationality were also rated exceptionally well, as was the overall value proposition. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Nairobi reviews are overwhelmingly positive (90.5%), highlighting strong academic prestige, employability, and faculty quality. Minor criticisms (~1.4%) include overcrowding and infrastructure needs.

With an average rating of 4.78/5, approximately 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise brilliant, supportive lecturers and a great environment, though some mention limited resources like internet and computers, and the cold weather.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students praise the solid academic foundation, approachable and committed lecturers, and supportive learning environment. Some suggest improvements in lab equipment, research opportunities, and career guidance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4/5, students praise Kiriri Women's University for its supportive and empowering academic environment. Lecturers are described as approachable and knowledgeable, fostering personalized attention and growth.

With a single review, this university garners a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights engaging practical learning and friendly, approachable facilitators. No negative feedback was received.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
78%
68%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
37%
22%
20%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
8%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Solid Foundation for a Career in Travel Tourism.

I started my Bachelor of Arts in Travel and Tourism at the University of Nairobi in 2015. The program gave me a solid foundation for understanding how the tourism and travel industry works, both locally and internationally. The coursework explored important areas like tourism management, destination development, and sustainable tourism. Through these subjects, I developed a deeper appreciation for how tourism drives economic growth and fosters cultural exchange. The lectures were not only knowledgeable but also genuinely supportive, often going the extra mile to mentor students beyond the classroom. Being in Nairobi was a real advantage. We had direct exposure to a vibrant tourism sector and a variety of industry stakeholders, which made learning much more practical and meaningful. Although some administrative processes could be a bit slow at times, my overall academic experience was truly rewarding. I recommend this program to anyone interested in building a career in the tourism and travel industry.

School as a flame of knowledge.

It is a good place to learn and fully explore your career. What I like is the commitment of the staff to make the school a better place. And what I dislike is the cold weather that makes school experience bad ,at times. I recommend that the school to have enough infrastructure for the well being of the students especially the lecture hall seats.

It is a resourceful and productive school

Students are equipped with all the necessary resources that is lecturers, class equipment, laboratories and lab equipment. However, the school staff may at times be reluctant to cater for students' needs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close