Estácio vs Universidade Belas Artes vs Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM vs Foundation Christ Life University - FUNVIC vs Centro Universitário Facens

Side-by-side comparison from 25 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM (5.00)
Estácio: wins 3/7 categories
Universidade Belas Artes: wins 1/7 categories
Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM: wins 3/7 categories
Foundation Christ Life University - FUNVIC: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Universitário Facens: wins 0/7 categories
Centro Universitário São Camilo: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.20
Read more reviews
23 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.05
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.27
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.41
Win
1.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.05
Win
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.68
1.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.50
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +Flexible class schedules and balance with other responsibilities
  • +Good infrastructure and student benefits/opportunities
  • +Engaging and effective teaching
  • +Supportive learning environment
  • +Strong academic reputation and career prospects
  • +Engaging and entertaining learning environment
  • +High-quality faculty and professional instructors
  • +Excellent program structure and organization

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for distance learning students are problematic.
  • -The institution's financial focus overshadows student welfare and education.
  • -Nepotism and lack of fairness in opportunities.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a significant problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives strong acclaim for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.27. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning 4.05. The **Location** is rated at a solid 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3.5, and **Internationality** also presents a lower score at 3.41. **Value** falls in the middle at 3.68.

This institution's strongest asset is its prime location, earning a perfect score. Conversely, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received the lowest possible rating, indicating significant areas requiring improvement.

This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and overall value. Student life also garners a positive rating. However, significant weaknesses are evident in its location and accommodation, both receiving zero marks. Internationality is rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, good infrastructure, and flexible schedules. A small portion of feedback (~13%) mentions concerns about financial focus and inconsistent teaching.

The single review is entirely negative, rating the university 1/5. It highlights frustration and nepotism as key issues, suggesting a lack of meritocracy.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight the excellent structure and engaging content, with experienced professionals leading classes. There is no negative feedback to report.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
52%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
30%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close