Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Universitas Trilogi vs Jakarta State Polytechnic vs Jakarta State University vs Politeknik APP Jakarta

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jakarta State University (4.70)
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Trilogi: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State Polytechnic: wins 0/7 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 7/7 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Persada Indonesia Y.A.I: wins 0/7 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Food Industry
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and helpful lecturers
  • +Up-to-date practical learning experiences
  • +Improved campus facilities
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -They are unhappy with the outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Students find the course content and teaching methods ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Location**, both rated a solid 4. **Student Life** also scores well at 4. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, with a rating of 2.5, and **Accomodation**, at 3. Professors and the overall **Value** are rated moderately at 3.5 and 3, respectively.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 3.5/5 average rating and ~50% positive feedback, reviews highlight helpful lecturers and well-equipped labs. Some mention improved campus facilities and learning quality. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
0%
50%
33%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close