Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ vs Yarsi University vs Krida Wacana Christian University vs Jayabaya University vs Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Muhammadiyah Jakarta University - UMJ: wins 0/3 categories
Yarsi University: wins 3/3 categories
Krida Wacana Christian University: wins 0/3 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 0/3 categories
Universitas Prof Dr Moestopo Beragama: wins 0/3 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/3 categories
University of Bunda Mulia - UBM: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Best programme: International Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
3.00
5.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
Not rated
5.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.50
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Value
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi

Nothing to show

  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
  • +Interactive and comprehensible learning environment.
  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance

Nothing to show

Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
  • -Disorganized and unhelpful administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from instructors and the institution is a persistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

Nothing to show

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its location is exceptionally rated at 5, and student life and professors both score well with a 4. Areas for improvement are facilities and accommodation, each receiving a 3, which represent the weakest aspects of the university's offering. Internationality also sits at a moderate 3.

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight an eventful and immersive learning experience, with interactive and easy-to-comprehend lectures. No negative reviews were recorded.

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
50%
0%
4★
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close