Centro Universitário Eurípides Soares da Rocha - UNIVEM vs University Goce Delcev vs Federal Polytechnic Nekede - FPNO vs California State University Long Beach vs Manav Rachna University
Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and dedicated professors
- +Relevant and modern academic programs
- +Friendly and international community
- +Passionate, knowledgeable, and helpful lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment and practical-based courses
- +Effective teaching methods and dedicated faculty
- +Welcoming and friendly campus community
- +Opportunities for personal growth and new experiences
- +Engaging learning and enriching academic programs
Nothing to show
- +Excellent teaching quality and supportive professors
- +Collaborative and diverse student community
- +Positive impact on career and personal development
- +Small class sizes and individualized lecturer support
- +Practical, career-focused curriculum with diverse subject coverage
- +User-friendly application and flexible, supportive learning environment
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of support for student well-being and mental health is a major concern.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, especially in art buildings.
- -Lack of practical career preparation and too many general education courses.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create a negative student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for students are prevalent complaints.
Nothing to show
This university presents a mixed review, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring a solid 3.67. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** received moderate ratings of 3. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** are identified as the weakest points, each averaging 2.67. The **Value** proposition sits in the middle at 3.33.
This university garners a strong score in Student Life, reaching 4.18, and an even higher mark for Value at 4.36, indicating excellent perceived return on investment. Conversely, Accomodation, rated at 3.62, and Internationality, at 3.55, represent the areas with the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Location fall within a similar, moderately positive range.
A review of university ratings reveals strengths in core academic and social aspects. Professors and Student Life received particularly high scores, both exceeding 4.3. Facilities also performed well, scoring 4.31. Conversely, Location emerged as the lowest-rated category, with a score of 3.68. Accomodation and Value were also moderate, at 3.90 and 3.76 respectively.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its prime location, accommodating housing options, and overall value, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and international appeal are also highly rated at 4.5. The faculty are also praised with a strong 4.5. Conversely, the facilities represent the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.
This university's ratings show a strong emphasis on its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.43. **Location** also scores highly at 4.38. Conversely, **accommodation** presents as the area needing the most development, with a rating of 3.46. Student life and value are rated similarly around 3.93, while professors and internationality are solid at 4.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, the university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from students. Recurring themes highlight supportive and informative professors, a positive learning environment, and valuable international experiences.
With an average rating of 4.32/5, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for its passionate and knowledgeable lecturers, conducive learning environment, and practical-based courses. No negative feedback was received.
Approximately 76% of reviews are positive, highlighting learning opportunities, networking, and a welcoming campus environment. A small portion of feedback, around 9.5%, expresses concerns about career-focused skills and specific facility issues.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight excellent teaching quality, supportive and approachable lecturers, and a collaborative, diverse community. The university is credited with positively shaping careers and lives.
University reviews are largely positive (~71%), with students appreciating smaller class sizes and individual lecturer support. Some mention a demanding block system and desire for improved administrative communication.
Nothing to show
The university is just fine. Always puts my interests first. The professors are also very nice and informative. The Erasmus + program works very well, a lot of students have already went on the Erasmus + exchange program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Good but you have to be ready to take on a busy academic schedule, the four quarter system, means more work spaced out in smaller time frame as opposed to a traditional semester schedule. The hybrid learning model allows you to balance school and your personal life, whilst giving you the responsibility of managing your school work