Gunadarma University vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI vs Krida Wacana Christian University vs Jayabaya University vs Jakarta State University
Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
- +Good facilities and helpful tutors
- +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Diverse range of programs and majors
- +Good course material and practical applications
Nothing to show
- +Practical application and project engagement
- +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
- +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
- +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
- +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
Nothing to show
- +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
- +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
Nothing to show
- -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.
Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.
Nothing to show
The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.
Nothing to show
Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.
All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.
Nothing to show
This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show