Nazarbayev University - NU vs University of Kent vs Utah State University Eastern vs Astana Medical University vs Murang'a University of Technology
Side-by-side comparison from 221 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Supportive and engaging teaching from experienced professors.
- +Beautiful campus and excellent on-site facilities and resources.
- +Valuable career support and unique course/degree opportunities.
Nothing to show
- +Few professors are truly passionate and knowledgeable
- +Curriculum is demanding but has a gap between theory and practice
- +Administrative processes are frustrating with unclear communication and schedule changes
- +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
- +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
- +Quality IT and applied science programs
- +Welcoming and supportive student community
- +Engaging campus life and opportunities for involvement
- +Modern facilities and practical, forward-thinking curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Poor quality teaching and lack of lecturer expertise.
- -Insufficient financial resources impacting the department.
- -Limited student support and focus on student development.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality of teaching and curriculum is often criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Location** also scored highly, indicating positive aspects in these areas. Conversely, **Value** presents as the weakest point, with the lowest score. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately, alongside **Professors**, suggesting room for improvement in these student experience components.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its faculty expertise and international student engagement, both receiving a notable 4 out of 5. Conversely, the facilities, student life, and accommodation offerings are areas with room for improvement, each scoring 2.5. The university's location and overall value also received mid-range assessments.
With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.
This institution garners its highest marks for its facilities, scoring an impressive 4.49. Other strong areas include accommodation (4.36) and location (4.30). Student life, professors, and value also receive solid scores, all above 4.0. Conversely, internationality stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of just under 3.0.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
With ~87% positive feedback, students highlight a lively, beautiful campus, kind professors, and engaging teaching. A small ~2.3% of reviews mention poor teaching quality and lack of student development focus.
Nothing to show
With one positive review and no negative feedback, sentiment leans positive (~50%). Students describe a demanding curriculum with some theory-practice gaps and outdated teaching methods. Administrative issues were also noted.
University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.
~92% of 88 reviews are positive, praising the welcoming student community, supportive environment, and engaging student life. Modern dorms and opportunities for involvement are also highlighted. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
The chemistry degree is just a total waste of time and money , since 2020 many of the good lecturers have left which means that the bad ones remain. In every university you get bad teachers which is a given,but when the department is already small the bad ones remain.. a perfect example of this is the lack of effort what people need to understand that the chemistry department has zero money all the funding comes from teaching which is is at a loss so your only choice is to share modules with Forensic science students which has lots of money just to keep chemistry department a float. I have left Kent two years now not used a single bit of what I was taught... and many others have also experienced this. You should be aware that Kent teaches you so little it like a trap and to be honest I have met few people who have simply not prepared for working with other departments because they lack the skills due to bad training. I mean when your O-chem lecturers are just SS of a book what dose that tell you about the people who work there 🤔 just don't care ! I really don't see why anyone would ever go to Kent when there are so many other university that offer so much more. I mean I learned more from lecturer notes from my colleagues from different universities than the ones from my department! The courses are terrible with very little room for learning what you want to as they are all compulsory. STAY AWAY.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Living in Kazakhstan while studying at Astana IT University has been a unique and enriching experience. Astana, the capital, is a city of contrasts, blending modern architecture with cultural heritage. The university’s location in the EXPO Business Center places it at the heart of this vibrant city, surrounded by iconic landmarks like the Nur Alem Pavilion. The city’s infrastructure is well-developed, with plenty of malls, cafes, and cultural venues like the Astana Opera, which I’ve enjoyed exploring. The university gives a comfortable and supportive environment. Student housing is modern, fostering a sense of community. Seasonal events and clubs have helped me make friends and feel connected. Winters are harsh but magical, while summers are warm and perfect for outdoor activities. Challenges include the high cost of living and the city’s remote location. Additionally, the university’s focus on IT limits opportunities for humanities students. Despite this, my time here has been a blend of academic growth and cultural immersion, making it a memorable chapter in my life.
Nothing to show
