Chernihiv National University of Technology vs Estácio vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Schoolcraft College vs Islamia University of Bahawalpur

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Islamia University of Bahawalpur (5.00)
Chernihiv National University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Estácio: wins 0/7 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 4/7 categories
Schoolcraft College: wins 0/7 categories
Islamia University of Bahawalpur: wins 3/7 categories
Metapilot Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Brahmaputra International University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
29 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: MBA
Livonia, Michigan, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Barcelona, Spain
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.89
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
3.96
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.11
4.33
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
3.14
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
3.78
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
Not rated
3.64
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.29
4.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Qualified and professional teachers
  • +Good academic knowledge and reputation
  • +Hostel accommodation and extracurricular activities
  • +Excellent professors and teaching quality
  • +Supportive customer service and user-friendly online platform
  • +Good infrastructure and flexible learning options
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and friendly faculty
  • +Positive and encouraging university environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and unclear management communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inflexible curriculum and limited academic support.
  • -Financial focus over student care and support.
  • -Lack of clear guidance and disorganization in online courses.
  • -Inconsistent teaching methods and poor administrative response.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of effective communication and clear expectations frustrate students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform performance across all assessed domains. With zero ratings in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no discernibly stronger or weaker areas. The university exhibits a consistent level of feedback in every category provided.

Academic and extracurricular offerings are generally well-regarded, with professors receiving a notable 4.11 and student life scoring a respectable 3.78. Facilities are also rated favorably at 3.89. However, areas such as accommodation (3.29) and internationality (3.14) present the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Value for money is rated moderately at 3.64.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, with perfect ratings for both location and accommodation. Facilities and professors also receive high marks, indicating a strong academic and physical environment. Student life and value for money are solid, though internationality presents a relative weakness compared to other aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight qualified and professional teachers, good knowledge acquisition, and a promising reputation. Some suggest updating outdated programs.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, quality teaching, and good online platforms. A small percentage (~10%) express concerns about financial focus and lack of student support.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Students express high satisfaction, with 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include a good university environment and supportive, friendly faculty who encourage learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
45%
67%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
34%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close