Universitas Terbuka - UT vs Gunadarma University vs Yarsi University vs Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG vs Universitas MH Thamrin

Side-by-side comparison from 31 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas MH Thamrin (5.00)
Universitas Terbuka - UT: wins 0/4 categories
Gunadarma University: wins 0/4 categories
Yarsi University: wins 4/4 categories
Indonesian State College of Meteorology Climatology and Geophysics - STMKG: wins 0/4 categories
Universitas MH Thamrin: wins 0/4 categories
Jakarta State University: wins 0/4 categories
Politeknik APP Jakarta: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
18 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Hospital and Healthcare Management
Best programme: Food Industry
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Trade
Category ratings
Facilities
4.28
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.33
4.00
Location
4.59
4.50
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.17
4.50
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
4.17
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.50
4.67
4.00
Student life
4.17
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.67
4.00
Value
4.39
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.67
4.00
Accommodation
4.13
4.17
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.67
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible and accessible distance learning for working professionals.
  • +Well-structured academic programs with good quality materials.
  • +Supportive faculty and organized learning environment.
  • +Professional certification and practical learning opportunities
  • +Good facilities and helpful tutors
  • +Strong programs with skilled lecturers
  • +Cleanliness and modern facilities
  • +Kind, friendly staff and lecturers
  • +Integrated technology like CCTV and Wi-Fi

Nothing to show

  • +Relevant programs and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical learning and industry partnerships
  • +Dynamic and critical idea exchange
  • +High-quality, career-ready graduates.
  • +Comprehensive, innovative, and practical academic programs.
  • +Excellent facilities and pleasant learning environment.
  • +Balanced theory and practical application for workforce skills.
  • +Approachable and supportive lecturers offering teamwork and project opportunities.
  • +Strong career preparation in international trade and business.
Cons
  • -Lack of effective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -A disconnect between curriculum and real-world application is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources impede learning and comfort.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching effectiveness are a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant industry connections.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of instructor engagement and course structure disappoints students.
Rating summary
What students say

With an exceptional score of 4.59, the university's **location** stands out as its strongest attribute. Other well-regarded areas include **facilities** (4.28) and **value** (4.39). The **accommodation** score, at 4.13, is slightly lower in comparison but still reflects a positive reception across most surveyed aspects of student experience.

Across various assessments, this institution demonstrates notable strengths. Its professors, location, and perceived value all received top marks at 4.5. Areas like facilities, student life, and accommodation also scored well, averaging around 4.17. Internationality, while still positive, was the lowest-rated aspect at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with particular excellence in its academic staff, setting, and perceived worth.

This institution receives perfect scores across the board, indicating outstanding performance in all evaluated areas. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all rated at the highest possible level, presenting a uniformly excellent experience for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings.

Nothing to show

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Notably, its **Professors** and **Accomodation** received perfect marks, indicating exceptional quality in teaching and living arrangements. **Student Life** and **Value** also scored very highly, suggesting a vibrant campus experience and good return on investment. The university's **Facilities** and **Location** are also well-regarded. The lowest rating was for **Internationality**, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength, with perfect scores for both its professors and location. Students also report highly positive experiences with student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. The facilities receive a solid rating, representing the only area below a 4.5, yet still indicating a strong overall offering.

Across the board, this institution achieves commendable scores in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value all stand at a strong 4 out of 5. The consistent high marks suggest a well-rounded and positive university experience with no single area significantly lagging behind others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.5/5 average rating and no negative feedback, students praise flexibility for working professionals and accessible, well-organized materials. ~94% of feedback is positive.

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise program quality, campus facilities, and helpful staff. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, Yarsi University is positively perceived as a good Muslim campus. The single review highlights cleanliness and modern facilities. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a great and relevant campus with diverse programs, knowledgeable faculty, and excellent resources. Practical learning and industry partnerships are appreciated.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, the three reviews are entirely positive. Students highlight the university's role in preparing graduates for the workforce, comprehensive culinary arts curriculum, and good campus facilities and accessibility.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The student praised the program's blend of theory and practice, supportive lecturers, and career preparation. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
50%
0%
0%
100%
67%
0%
4★
39%
50%
100%
0%
0%
33%
100%
3★
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close