Belarusian State Economic University - BSEU vs Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics - BSUIR vs ESIC University vs Belarusian State University - BSU vs Media Design University of Applied Sciences - MDH

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ESIC University (4.50)
Belarusian State Economic University - BSEU: wins 2/4 categories
Belarusian State University of Informatics and Radioelectronics - BSUIR: wins 0/4 categories
ESIC University: wins 2/4 categories
Belarusian State University - BSU: wins 0/4 categories
Media Design University of Applied Sciences - MDH: wins 0/4 categories
Cox's Bazar International University: wins 0/4 categories
Belarusian State University of Foreign Languages - bsufl: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Madrid, Spain
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: English Language and Linguistics
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.50
3.50
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
5.00
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.50
3.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.50
3.50
4.00
Win
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Student life
4.50
Win
4.00
3.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
3.50
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.00
3.50
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive international student services and multicultural environment
  • +High-quality teaching and strong theoretical education
  • +Modern facilities and extensive library resources
  • +Practical application of theoretical knowledge.
  • +Excellent facilities and accommodation.
  • +Supportive and great university staff.
  • +Practical, real-world insights from industry professionals
  • +Interactive learning and collaborative projects
  • +Modern, welcoming campus facilities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +N/A (No positive reviews provided)
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frustrating.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are problematic.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content and teaching methods lack engagement and relevance.
Rating summary
What students say

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional performance, achieving a perfect score of 5 in every category. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are all highly regarded. With no areas falling below a top rating, the university presents a uniformly strong and outstanding offering to its students.

This institution garners positive marks in several key areas, with its **Location** and **Student Life** standing out at a strong 4.0. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also score well at 3.5. Conversely, **Professors** represent the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3.0. **Accommodations** are similarly rated at 3.0, while **Value** balances out at 3.5.

Demonstrating a clear strength in its academic offerings, the university received a perfect score for its professors. Areas such as facilities and accommodation also scored well, indicating a solid foundation. Conversely, location and student life were rated as average, while internationality and value presented a more favorable, yet not outstanding, picture.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an exceptional score in **location** (5), the university truly shines in this aspect. However, a low rating for **internationality** (1) suggests a significant area for improvement. Other categories, including facilities, student life, accommodation, and value, received moderate ratings of 3, while professors were rated a solid 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate the university's support for international students, multicultural environment, and helpful administration. They also note modern facilities and well-educated teachers, though some mention a desire for more practical application and increased English language hours.

With one positive review and no negative feedback, sentiment leans heavily positive (~100%). Students appreciate the opportunity to apply theory to practice, good facilities, and helpful staff. The average rating is 3.5/5.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight well-structured, practical courses and engaged, professional instructors, with no negative reviews recorded.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. This indicates a ~100% positive sentiment.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
25%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close