The Hague University of Applied Sciences - THUAS vs University of Groningen - RUG vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs TIAS School for Business and Society vs La Salle Almere

Side-by-side comparison from 219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TIAS School for Business and Society (5.00)
The Hague University of Applied Sciences - THUAS: wins 0/7 categories
University of Groningen - RUG: wins 0/7 categories
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 0/7 categories
TIAS School for Business and Society: wins 5/7 categories
La Salle Almere: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 2/7 categories
Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: European Studies
Groningen, The Netherlands
3.90
Read more reviews
101 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Information Sciences
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Almere, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: BBA (EBA) specialisation Entrepreneurship & Digital Marketing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.12
3.77
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.44
3.25
Location
4.49
4.03
3.92
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.74
3.71
Professors
4.11
3.82
4.13
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.75
3.38
Internationality
4.59
4.28
4.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.60
4.88
Student life
4.27
4.19
3.98
2.00
Not rated
4.56
Win
2.63
Value
4.11
3.98
4.19
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
3.38
Accommodation
3.46
2.88
3.13
2.00
Not rated
4.32
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality programs and engaging content
  • +Excellent facilities and vibrant campus environment
  • +Strong lecturers, supportive staff, and ample career opportunities
  • +High-quality, innovative education and renowned faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and resources
  • +International atmosphere and self-development opportunities
  • +Strong theory-practice balance and real-world application
  • +High-quality, challenging, and expert-led education
  • +Diverse community and international opportunities
  • +Personal assistance and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Engaging professors and insightful discussions

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
  • +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
  • +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
Cons
  • -Lack of practical and relevant learning.
  • -Poor course content and quality of education.
  • -Disappointing and unmotivating academic experience.
  • -Lack of academic and administrative support, with uncaring professors and high failure rates.
  • -Negative and exclusionary cultural environment, including racism, bullying, and stereotypes.
  • -Poor communication and confusing academic processes that do not accommodate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Communication and course organization are often cited as lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology impede learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, most notably Internationality (4.59) and Location (4.49). Facilities also score highly at 4.43. Student Life and Professors are rated well, both at 4.11, with Value also matching this score. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.46.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Internationality stands out as its strongest point, with a very high rating. Student life and facilities also receive strong scores, reflecting positive campus experiences. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. Professors and value are rated competently, while location is also a solid performer.

This institution received its highest marks for Internationality, closely followed by Value and Professors. Student Life also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with Facilities also rating lower than other aspects. Location sits in the mid-range of these assessments.

Across the surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **facilities, professors, location, internationality, and perceived value**, all receiving perfect scores. In contrast, areas for development appear to be **student life and accommodation**, with significantly lower ratings in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~73% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent programs, facilities, and career opportunities. The environment and student life are also praised. A small ~3% of feedback expresses disappointment with a lack of practical learning in specific courses.

~74% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and innovative teaching. ~12% of reviews express concerns about lack of support and difficult academics.

~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising the quality of education, practical application, and international environment. No negative feedback was received.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. This suggests a highly positive experience, with feedback praising personal assistance and engaging professors. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.

Rating distribution
5★
24%
35%
38%
100%
0%
75%
25%
4★
43%
37%
50%
0%
0%
25%
38%
3★
30%
17%
12%
0%
0%
0%
38%
2★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Still have plenty of room to improve

I will only talk about my major here, but in general, ICM is good with a broad career prospect. The teachers are always there to help us. They also handled the pandemic situation quite good. I chose THUAS and ICM because I could experience both a semester exchange and internship, unlike the other unis. For some reason student life after the pandemic is a lot better, with various fun activities and external events, maybe because we just stayed at home for a year or more:) The cons: understaffed, so we could see if the teachers are tired and sometimes affect us (and the time we get our grade). Overall, ICM at THUAS is 7/10

Awful school

Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284

:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close