Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs University of Calicut vs New York University Shanghai - NYU Shanghai vs Universidad del Mar - UMAR vs Technion Israel institute of Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Mar - UMAR (5.00)
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/7 categories
University of Calicut: wins 3/7 categories
New York University Shanghai - NYU Shanghai: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Mar - UMAR: wins 0/7 categories
Technion Israel institute of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
University of Haifa: wins 0/7 categories
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Thenhipalam, India
4.50
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce in Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Win
Professors
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.30
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
3.50
Value
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.67
4.50
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.33
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Vast course offerings and strong academic departments
  • +Excellent infrastructure and campus environment
  • +Quality study materials and fair examination processes

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent facilities in natural settings
  • +Full-time educational model promoting dedication

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent teaching and distinguished faculty
  • +Supportive programs for immigrants and well-equipped dormitories
  • +High-quality education and strong reputation
  • +Diverse academic subjects and cultural environment
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were a significant concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management practices caused frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and relevant course content was disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication are significant concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies create confusion and delays.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching quality can be inconsistent or ineffective.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Academic strengths are evident, with a high rating for Professors at 4.4. Student Life also scores well at 4.3, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Facilities and Internationality both received a solid 4.2, while Location is also favorably rated at 4.33. Accommodations and Value are slightly lower but still positive, at 4.0 and 4.2 respectively.

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, the university received uniform ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in any area, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or perceived value. The consistent evaluation suggests a uniform lack of positive or negative attributes identified by the rating system.

Nothing to show

This university's strongest area is its professors, receiving a perfect 4. The weakest aspects include accommodation and internationality, both scoring 2.33. Facilities, student life, and value received moderate ratings around 2.67, while location sits at a 3. Overall, teaching quality stands out, contrasting with lower scores in living arrangements and global integration.

This institution garners high marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Professors, Location, and Accommodation**, all receiving a strong 4.5. Facilities and Internationality are also well-regarded at 4 and 4 respectively, with Value also achieving a 4.5. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Student Life**, which received the lowest score of 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 10 reviews, feedback is ~90% positive. Students praise course variety and quality education. A small amount of negative feedback noted potential for improvement.

Nothing to show

This university receives a single 5-star review. The positive feedback highlights its natural facilities, conducive to learning, and a full-time educational model supporting dedication to study and research.

Nothing to show

University reviews are largely positive (~67% of feedback). Students highlight excellent teaching and a diverse community with helpful programs. Dorms are noted as well-equipped.

Two reviews indicate a highly positive sentiment, with students praising the university's excellent education, particularly in science and math, and its diverse academic and cultural environment. Negative feedback is absent.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
60%
0%
100%
0%
33%
0%
4★
0%
30%
0%
0%
0%
33%
100%
3★
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close