Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP vs University of Tuzla - UNTZ vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs International Business Information Academy - IPIA vs American College Dublin - ACD

Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Escuela Superior de Administración Pública - ESAP: wins 0/2 categories
University of Tuzla - UNTZ: wins 0/2 categories
European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla: wins 0/2 categories
International Business Information Academy - IPIA: wins 1/2 categories
American College Dublin - ACD: wins 0/2 categories
Tennessee Technological University - TTU: wins 0/2 categories
Rhode Island College: wins 1/2 categories
Comparing
Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
3.50
Read more reviews
101 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Information Technology
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
3.13
Not rated
4.00
2.87
4.29
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
4.01
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.20
3.86
3.00
Professors
Not rated
4.02
Not rated
5.00
3.86
4.29
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.15
Not rated
5.00
3.71
4.29
5.00
Student life
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
5.00
2.87
4.29
5.00
Value
Not rated
3.68
Not rated
5.00
3.71
4.14
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.28
Not rated
5.00
2.93
3.71
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, professional, and helpful professors
  • +Good educational programs fulfilling expectations
  • +Supportive environment and career prospects
  • +Friendly and accessible professors
  • +Good learning opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and location
  • +Quality education with supportive staff and professors
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities and classrooms
  • +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
  • +Strong focus on student success and career development
  • +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
  • +Strong, well-structured programmes with supportive, helpful faculty and good guidance.
  • +Welcoming and collaborative campus environment with financial support opportunities.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with industry connections and good value.
  • +Diverse and engaging campus life
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Inclusive and accepting community
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and organizational issues are pervasive.
  • -Lack of practical application and outdated facilities are significant problems.
  • -Some professors exhibit poor teaching methods and rudeness.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant, lacking practical application and depth.
  • -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
  • -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a concern.
  • -Lack of essential resources impacts learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and real-world skill development are a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Regarding university performance, professors and location stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving ratings around 4.0. Student life and value are also well-regarded, scoring above 3.5. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, accommodation, and internationality, which are rated in the low 3s. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid but varied performance across these key metrics.

This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.

This institution demonstrates outstanding performance, achieving a perfect score in Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Its strongest areas are clearly these aspects, reflecting a highly positive student experience and excellent offerings. The Facilities rating, while still very good at 4, represents the only slight area for potential improvement within an otherwise exceptional overall assessment.

This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.

This university garners excellent scores in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all receiving a strong 4.29 out of 5. Value also scores well at 4.14. The weakest aspects appear to be Location, rated at 3.86, and Accommodation, which stands at 3.71. Overall, the institution demonstrates high satisfaction in academic and campus experience aspects.

This institution excels in numerous aspects, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. These areas represent its strongest performance. The university's location, however, received a lower rating of 3, suggesting it is the weakest area in this evaluation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Around 46% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality staff and curriculum, with some noting occasional subjective grading. About 17% are negative, citing poor organization and lack of practical application. The average rating is 3.49/5.

With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.

The sole review is highly positive, awarding 5 out of 5 stars. Students praise the quality education, supportive professors, and modern, well-equipped facilities. No negative feedback was recorded.

Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.

With a 4.43/5 average rating from 7 reviews, ~86% of feedback is positive. Students praise well-structured programs, helpful faculty, and affordability. Some mention a need for campus facility improvement and a small town location.

Based on one review, the university is rated 5/5. The student highlighted a great campus with many activities and a variety of psychology class options. They also praised the creative, accepting student body.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
23%
33%
100%
7%
57%
100%
4★
0%
23%
67%
0%
79%
29%
0%
3★
0%
38%
0%
0%
7%
14%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A waste of money

The price for the master's is insanely expensive considering what it has to offer. I got an MA in translation and interpreting, but sadly, my colleagues and I barely had any practical exercises in these subjects. Most of the professors were alright though. Bearing in mind where they work, most of them try to do their best. The university is politicized, since the politicians play with it like with ping-pong balls. The only aim is to employ their own people, no matter how incompetent they are, instead of the people who are actually able to do proper work. Anyone in their right mind (since I was not one of those people) will opt to study abroad and obtain the MA degree somewhere else. I paid 2500 KM so I can have a degree from an XY rated university, instead of studying in, say, Germany or Austria, where the prices are identical, or even lower, and where students can also get real scholarships if they're good enough. Once again, a waste of money. If only they (politicians) invested all that money in infrastructure and better equipment, the university would be a much nicer place and the main Uni building would not have 40 YO doors and windows.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close