Rotman School of Management vs Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College vs Damascus University - DU vs Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST vs Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology - JOOUST

Side-by-side comparison from 19 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College (5.00)
Rotman School of Management: wins 1/4 categories
Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College: wins 0/4 categories
Damascus University - DU: wins 0/4 categories
Higher Institute for Applied Sciences and Technology - HIAST: wins 0/4 categories
Jaramogi Oginga Odinga University of Science and Technology - JOOUST: wins 1/4 categories
ESTIA Institute of Technology: wins 0/4 categories
Syrian Virtual University: wins 2/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Master of Business Administration
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Telecommunications Engineering
Best programme: Early Childhood Education
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.67
4.00
4.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
5.00
Win
4.00
4.40
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Professors
5.00
5.00
4.33
4.00
4.71
Not rated
3.67
Internationality
5.00
3.00
3.67
5.00
4.00
Not rated
3.67
Student life
4.00
5.00
3.33
5.00
4.83
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
4.00
3.83
3.00
4.86
Win
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
3.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong career services and location advantage
  • +Excellent faculty expertise
  • +Intensive MBA program structure
  • +Friendly and helpful teachers
  • +Positive social environment and friendships
  • +Strong academic programs and dedicated faculty
  • +Modern learning environment and updated materials
  • +Opportunities for student growth and development
  • +Prestigious, rigorous applied sciences and engineering education
  • +High-quality graduates well-prepared for careers
  • +Specialized focus on telecommunications, microwave, and RF engineering
  • +Conducive learning environment and dedicated, supportive lecturers
  • +Rigorous academic programs with a comprehensive, practical curriculum
  • +Vibrant student life and timely administrative processes

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online lectures and self-paced learning
  • +Affordability and recognized accreditation
  • +Online program and remote learning access
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Student support services are perceived as lacking and ineffective.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers learning effectively.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is problematic.
  • -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and resources
  • -Lack of engaging or relevant curriculum
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from administration.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Limited support and insufficient faculty availability.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Overcrowding and limited access to essential services cause considerable dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect scores. Students can expect high-quality instruction and a vibrant, globally-connected environment. The university also scores well in **facilities** and **student life**, indicating a positive overall experience. However, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3, suggesting potential room for improvement in this aspect. **Value** is rated a solid 4.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, most notably for its **Professors and Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, lies in its **Internationality**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Overall, the Value for money is rated positively at 4.

This institution exhibits a strong standing, particularly in its **Location** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Conversely, **Student Life** is rated as the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in that domain. Other aspects like Facilities, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate range.

This institution shines brightest in **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accommodation** are also strong points, earning solid 4s. However, **Location** is a significant weakness, with a score of 0, and **Value** sits at a moderate 3, indicating areas for improvement.

This university garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in Student Life and Value, both scoring close to a perfect 5. Professors also receive very high marks. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities, which received the lowest rating, along with Location and Accommodation, which scored a solid but lower 4.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a perfect score. Location is another strong point, rated highly at 4.67. Student life, however, is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Accommodations and value for money are also well-regarded, both at 4.33. Ratings for professors and internationality are moderate, around 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. The single positive review highlighted good career services, location, and faculty. No negative feedback was provided.

This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights enjoyment and supportive, kind teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 4.17 average rating from 6 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~83%). Students praise academic programs, faculty, modern facilities, and growth opportunities. A few mentioned slightly outdated instruments or large class sizes.

With a single review, this university has a 4/5 average rating. The sole feedback was positive, highlighting a prestigious education and rigorous assessment that prepares graduates well for careers.

With a 4.57/5 average, ~100% of reviews are positive, praising academic excellence, dedicated lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. A minor negative mention highlights manual operations and some issues with online unit marks.

Nothing to show

All reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise flexibility in scheduling, affordability, and the convenience of online lectures. Some mention a desire for fully remote exams.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
33%
0%
57%
0%
0%
4★
100%
0%
50%
100%
43%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close