Universidade Anhembi Morumbi - AM vs Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP vs Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Ironhack

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP (5.00)
Universidade Anhembi Morumbi - AM: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Federal de Sao Paulo - IFSP: wins 0/6 categories
Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP: wins 2/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/6 categories
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa: wins 0/6 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
Not rated
4.50
4.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.71
Not rated
4.50
4.70
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.57
Not rated
4.83
Win
4.60
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
4.33
4.60
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Not rated
4.83
3.90
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.14
Not rated
4.83
Win
3.90
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Modern facilities and advanced technology.
  • +Well-structured and relevant programs.

Nothing to show

  • +Renowned academic quality and top-tier professors
  • +Excellent infrastructure and practical learning experiences
  • +Welcoming environment for international students
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support for students is prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives high marks across multiple categories. Location is its strongest suit, boasting a near-perfect score. Professors and facilities also stand out with excellent ratings. Student life and value are well-regarded, though slightly lower than other areas. Accommodation and internationality are rated a solid 4, indicating good but less exceptional performance compared to the university's top strengths.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional acclaim for its professors, student life, and perceived value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Facilities and location also scored highly, indicating a well-rounded and desirable environment. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still received a solid rating. Internationality is also a strong point, reflecting a diverse campus.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~78% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.22/5, students praise excellent faculty and advanced, modern facilities. Some minor criticisms mention superficial course content and lengthy, repetitive subjects.

Nothing to show

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise excellent infrastructure, top-tier professors, and the university's strong academic reputation and practical learning opportunities.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
44%
0%
100%
60%
50%
0%
0%
4★
33%
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
3★
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

the university is among the top 10 in latin america.

The university is wonderful and has a wonderful infrastructure, but policies for access to education and dissemination of scientific knowledge are still lacking for non-university people. The university still functions as a "bubble".

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close