Lesya Ukrainka East European National University vs Lutsk Polytechnic National University - NTU vs University of Wollongong - UOW vs Spiru Haret University vs Aarhus Business School - Aarhus BSS
Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly skilled and professional faculty.
- +Abundant opportunities for research and language practice.
- +Engaging extracurricular activities and events.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world learning and diverse international perspectives.
- +High-quality, engaging teaching from professional and passionate staff.
- +Strong career prospects and supportive alumni network.
- +Accessible and flexible for working students
- +Competent and available teachers
- +Modern facilities and engaging courses
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical, applicable course structure
- +Vibrant student life
- +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
- +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
- +Real-world application and career preparation
- +Supportive professors and helpful resources
- +Inspiring professional development opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support.
- -Outdated and inadequate facilities, with complaints about cleanliness and functionality.
- -Overpriced tuition relative to the quality of education and resources provided.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequent complaints.
- -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support causes frustration.
- -Unengaging or poorly delivered course content is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant concerns.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication frustrates students.
This institution excels in accommodations and value, both receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, student life, and internationality are also highly regarded, each earning a 4-star rating. The university's weakest area, however, is its location, which received a score of 0, indicating a significant drawback in this aspect.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** also receive very positive marks. In contrast, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other surveyed categories. **Value** also received a good rating, aligning with the majority of positive feedback.
This institution garners its highest marks for Professors and Location, both receiving a strong 4.25. Its Value is also notable at a perfect 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality present areas for potential improvement, each scoring 3.25. Facilities and Accommodations fall in the mid-range with solid 3.75 ratings.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.75. **Student Life** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a respectable 4. While **Accomodation** and **Location** are decent, the university's **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score of 2.75. **Professors** are rated moderately well.
This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.
This institution scores exceptionally well, with perfect ratings for **Facilities** and **Professors**, reflecting outstanding academic and infrastructural resources. The university also excels in **Value**, earning a full five stars. Areas of **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all strong, receiving four-star assessments, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded experience.
All 5 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise skilled teachers and research opportunities, especially within the English and French Philology department. Minor points include improving heating and reducing photocopy costs.
Nothing to show
With 15 positive reviews and an average rating of 4.47/5, students highlight seamless transfers, real international exposure, and excellent teaching. This feedback represents approximately 0% negative sentiment.
With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight accessible learning and available teachers. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professors' willingness to help and well-structured courses. Student life is also noted as amazing. No negative reviews were recorded.
Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review highlights exceptional professor support and inspiring university-organized events. Students appreciated the study resources and comfortable campuses, despite noting small, uncomfortable classrooms. This feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with approximately 100% positive sentiment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
First of all, the university is nowhere near as international as it portrays itself to be; there are less international students than you would expect. In terms of the teachers, I can honestly say I had one good teacher per semester. The others ranged from bad to completely unprofessional. Also with the planning of exams and classes, it sometimes made me wonder how the people behind this can be a part of the management department. However, on the bright side, I did like the idea of working in study groups and having to do all sorts of projects - that helps with the practical aspects of teaching. Another thing that I'd praise is the cafeteria, as they offer fresh and diverse food.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
