Aalborg University - AAU vs Zealand Institute of Business and Technology - ZIBAT vs IBA International Business Academy - IBA vs Niels Brock Copenhagen Business College vs Copenhagen Business Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and enthusiastic teachers
- +Inclusive and welcoming environment
- +Research opportunities and guidance
- +Practical, business-oriented learning
- +Supportive teaching and staff
- +Real-world application and skill development
- +Practical, skill-building curriculum with real-world application
- +Global, diverse student community and networking opportunities
- +Engaging historical city location with ongoing university improvements
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and responsive teachers who guide learning
- +Development of independent and resourceful learning skills
- +Real-world company projects and teamwork focus
- +Approachable and helpful professors
- +Practical, applicable course structure
- +Vibrant student life
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inefficient administrative and management systems cause significant frustration.
- -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not current.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Academic content is superficial and unclearly explained.
- -Teachers can be rude, unprofessional, and unclear.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant concerns.
Nothing to show
Across various metrics, this institution demonstrates a solid overall performance. Its highest-rated categories include Professors (4.33) and Facilities (4.31), indicating strengths in these core academic and infrastructural aspects. While still favorable, Accommodation (4.10) received the lowest score among the surveyed areas, suggesting it could be an area for further development. The university also received strong marks for Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, all falling between 4.18 and 4.28.
With a near-perfect score of 5 across most metrics, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, and accommodation. Student life and value for money also receive positive marks, scoring a 4. The primary area for improvement lies in its internationality, which is rated a 3, suggesting opportunities to enhance global engagement and diversity.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in its **professors**, receiving a strong score of 4. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** present the most significant areas for improvement, both scoring a low 2. Facilities and internationality are rated moderately at 3 and 3.5 respectively, while location and value land at a respectable 3.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and boasts impressive ratings for **internationality** and **facilities** alike. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, **value** for money and the quality of **professors** and **accommodation** are areas that could see improvement, though still receiving moderate ratings.
This institution receives exceptional ratings for its **Facilities**, scoring a high 4.75. **Student Life** and **Value** are also strong points, both earning a respectable 4. While **Accomodation** and **Location** are decent, the university's **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, receiving the lowest score of 2.75. **Professors** are rated moderately well.
Nothing to show
With a ~100% positive sentiment from 42 reviews, students highlight dedicated teachers, engaging courses, and excellent research opportunities. The university is praised for its inclusive and welcoming environment for international students.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight practical skills, strong teachers with business backgrounds, and good learning environments, particularly in international commerce and marketing.
With an average rating of 3.75/5, the university receives mostly positive feedback. Students highlight practical learning, skill development, and international exposure as key strengths, with approximately 0% expressing negative sentiment.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring missions, responsive teachers, and practical company work. ~25% of feedback mentioned a desire for a more in-depth academic experience and clearer teaching.
With an average rating of 4/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights professors' willingness to help and well-structured courses. Student life is also noted as amazing. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
I studied my master degree at Aalborg University from 2008-2010. It was the first time my master degree was offered and as always; a new education can struggle to find its feet. So it was very broad topics with the notice; that you could become anything you liked. I had to find my own path in this, but I like the fact that you are able to impact and create your own expertise within a broad field through the semester Projects and problem-based learning. It wasn't as hard as I had imagined (coming from a different type of education). I liked the freedom and requirement of independence that the program offered. I had a good experience; I know that program I studied have developed a lot since then and I think it has been for the better; some of the structure and topics we lacked are now a part of the program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all, the university is nowhere near as international as it portrays itself to be; there are less international students than you would expect. In terms of the teachers, I can honestly say I had one good teacher per semester. The others ranged from bad to completely unprofessional. Also with the planning of exams and classes, it sometimes made me wonder how the people behind this can be a part of the management department. However, on the bright side, I did like the idea of working in study groups and having to do all sorts of projects - that helps with the practical aspects of teaching. Another thing that I'd praise is the cafeteria, as they offer fresh and diverse food.
Nothing to show
