emlyon business school vs Universitè Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UCBL1 vs Burgundy School of Business vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Strong science and technology programs
- +Supportive professors and academic environment
- +Diverse student body
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
- +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
- +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
- +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
- +Supportive and inclusive learning environment
- +Practical and applied learning methods
- +Vibrant student life and international opportunities
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- +Real-world professional training and projects
- +Experiencing future job roles through practical exercises
- +Learning valuable marketing and business strategies
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Communication from staff is often poor and unhelpful.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
- -Unprepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Irrelevant courses and outdated curriculum.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum limit academic growth.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas, notably in **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value**, all receiving a rating of 4.67. **Professors** and **Location** also garnered strong scores. However, **Student Life** emerged as a significantly weaker aspect, with a rating of 2.33. **Internationality** received a moderate rating of 3.33.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **location**, scoring an impressive 4.33, and in **student life** at 4.24. Ratings for professors and internationality are also solid. The weakest area appears to be **accommodation**, receiving a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with room for improvement in specific aspects.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
Across several key areas, this institution receives outstanding feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated a perfect 5. Its weakest area is internationality, receiving a score of 3, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in campus resources and student experience.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
With an average rating of 4/5 based on 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise good facilities, well-equipped libraries, and a conducive environment, though some note older buildings and a serious atmosphere.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.
With a 3.91/5 average, ~74% of 22 reviews are positive, praising helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical teaching. Two negative reviews (9.1%) cited unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single positive review highlights practical, career-oriented projects and real-world problem-solving.
Nothing to show
The university itself is a bit outdated and the atmosphere can be quite serious. It can be difficult to enjoy the social aspect of university life when you're focused on a demanding academic program. However, it's important to remember that there is a diverse group of students at the university, with a variety of backgrounds and interests. It's possible to find a niche and connect with like-minded people, even in a more traditional academic environment.
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
Nothing to show
