emlyon business school vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal - SVKM vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India
Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed curriculum
- +Opportunities for student growth and participation in activities
- +Focus on student welfare and comprehensive education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong engineering and technology programs
- +Dedicated study and rigorous qualification processes
- +Management education expansion
- +Engaging and holistic learning experiences
- +Strong faculty and peer interactions
- +Industry-relevant curriculum and events
- +Personal and professional development support
- +Career preparation and branding assistance
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated curriculum are disliked.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from administration and faculty is a significant issue.
- -Heavy workload and challenging academic rigor are often cited as sources of dissatisfaction.
- -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the real world.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient resources and opportunities for practical learning.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and internationality. Student life and overall value are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a comparatively lower rating. Facilities are rated well but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, earning high marks for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, all rated a solid 4 out of 5. Student life also scores well at 3.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with notable strengths.
This institution excels in several key areas, with outstanding scores for location and student life, alongside a perfect rating for value. Professors also receive a commendable evaluation. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present significant weaknesses, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is identified as the sole area of concern, receiving the lowest possible rating.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves a perfect score of 5. Its strengths are uniformly distributed, with facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all receiving top marks. Consequently, there are no distinct weakest areas to highlight, as every aspect of the university has been rated exceptionally well.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these reviews highlight a positive student experience. The feedback praises excellent faculty, a strong curriculum, and supportive infrastructure, contributing to ~100% positive sentiment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a high average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight globally recognized excellence in engineering and technology, with some programs expanding into management. There is no negative feedback.
With one review, the SIES MBA program received a perfect 5/5 rating. The student praised its enriching curriculum, faculty, and diverse peers, suggesting more industry-focused events would improve the experience. No negative feedback was recorded.
This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating, with 100% of reviews being positive. Students highlight strong technical skill development alongside crucial soft skills like presentation and communication. The institution also provides valuable career preparation through workshops.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show