emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India

Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SIES COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES - SIESCOMS (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 4/7 categories
Mumbai University: wins 0/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India: wins 0/7 categories
SIES COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES - SIESCOMS: wins 3/7 categories
Thakur College of Engineering and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Mumbai, India
4.00
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: MBA
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Location
4.60
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.06
Win
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.60
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
1.00
Not rated
Student life
4.25
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.43
4.06
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical and international programs with diverse students
  • +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
  • +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
  • +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
  • +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Streamlined application and submission processes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Strong engineering and technology programs
  • +Dedicated study and rigorous qualification processes
  • +Management education expansion
  • +Engaging and holistic learning experiences
  • +Strong faculty and peer interactions
  • +Industry-relevant curriculum and events

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a frequent complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor communication from administration and faculty is a significant issue.
  • -Heavy workload and challenging academic rigor are often cited as sources of dissatisfaction.
  • -Students are frustrated with administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the real world.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, earning high marks for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, all rated a solid 4 out of 5. Student life also scores well at 3.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with notable strengths.

This institution excels in several key areas, with outstanding scores for location and student life, alongside a perfect rating for value. Professors also receive a commendable evaluation. Conversely, facilities and accommodation present significant weaknesses, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is identified as the sole area of concern, receiving the lowest possible rating.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a high average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight globally recognized excellence in engineering and technology, with some programs expanding into management. There is no negative feedback.

With one review, the SIES MBA program received a perfect 5/5 rating. The student praised its enriching curriculum, faculty, and diverse peers, suggesting more industry-focused events would improve the experience. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
60%
35%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
28%
38%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
9%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

specialisation in literature

The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close