emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs Aptech Aviation Academy - Aptech

Side-by-side comparison from 117 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: emlyon business school (4.50)
emlyon business school: wins 7/7 categories
Mumbai University: wins 0/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Aptech Aviation Academy - Aptech : wins 0/7 categories
Mithibai College: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Mumbai, India
4.00
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Mumbai, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.15
Win
3.55
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.61
Win
4.10
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.06
Win
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.60
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.27
Win
3.85
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.42
Win
4.06
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.96
Win
3.28
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and balanced academic/professional programs.
  • +Diverse student body and global environment.
  • +Ample opportunities for personal and professional development.
  • +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
  • +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Streamlined application and submission processes

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Learning was perceived as lacking depth and practical value.
  • -Frustrating and unfair grading systems, especially for group work, were common complaints.
  • -Program management and communication were seen as inadequate.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its location and internationality are standout features, receiving the highest scores. Student life and value are also strong points, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still rated moderately, falls below other categories. Facilities and professors also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, praising the academic rigor, practical focus, international environment, and career support. A small amount of feedback noted disappointing learning experiences and unfair grading.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
62%
35%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
27%
38%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
10%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

specialisation in literature

The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close