emlyon business school vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 145 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and balanced academic/professional programs.
- +Diverse student body and global environment.
- +Ample opportunities for personal and professional development.
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and practical learning environment
- +Vibrant student life and activities
- +International and diverse community
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Market-relevant skills leading to career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging learning experiences
- +Supportive and friendly community atmosphere
- -Learning was perceived as lacking depth and practical value.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading systems, especially for group work, were common complaints.
- -Program management and communication were seen as inadequate.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
Nothing to show
- -Poor professor preparedness and teaching quality
- -Irrelevant and expensive courses
- -Disorganized administration
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Inconsistent and unreliable administrative and management issues
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication and support from faculty and staff
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its location and internationality are standout features, receiving the highest scores. Student life and value are also strong points, indicating a positive overall experience. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which, while still rated moderately, falls below other categories. Facilities and professors also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its Location and Student Life, both receiving high marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Other surveyed categories, including Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value, fall within a moderate range, indicating generally satisfactory performance.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its faculty and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.8. Facilities and location also received high marks at 4.5. Student life and perceived value are positive at 4.25 and 4.2 respectively. The primary area for improvement, however, lies in accommodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.
Approximately 98% of reviews are positive, praising the academic rigor, practical focus, international environment, and career support. A small amount of feedback noted disappointing learning experiences and unfair grading.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3.89, roughly 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, enjoyable campus life, and practical learning. A small percentage of feedback noted unprepared professors and irrelevant coursework.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight career advancements and valuable market skills gained. They also praise high-quality courses, competent professors, and engaging events.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
