Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Tecnológica de Torreón - UTT vs Instituto Tecnólogico de La Laguna - ITLALAGUNA vs Universidad Autónoma del Noreste - UANE vs Escuela Normal de Torreón - ENT

Side-by-side comparison from 50 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Normal de Torreón - ENT (5.00)
Universidad del valle de México - UVM: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Tecnológica de Torreón - UTT: wins 2/4 categories
Instituto Tecnólogico de La Laguna - ITLALAGUNA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Autónoma del Noreste - UANE: wins 1/4 categories
Escuela Normal de Torreón - ENT: wins 0/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/4 categories
Universidad Iberoamericana de Torreón: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Business
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
5.00
Win
3.75
4.00
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Location
4.36
4.50
4.25
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.70
Not rated
Professors
4.50
5.00
4.25
5.00
Not rated
4.60
Not rated
Internationality
3.63
4.00
2.25
3.00
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Student life
4.47
5.00
4.00
5.00
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
Value
3.94
5.00
4.50
5.00
Not rated
3.90
Not rated
Accommodation
3.62
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and well-prepared professors
  • +Accessible education through scholarship opportunities
  • +Engaging extracurriculars and a sense of community
  • +Expert faculty and practical, real-world application
  • +Strong academic challenges and necessary resources
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive staff
  • +Strong engineering programs and diverse specialties
  • +Supportive faculty and good learning environment
  • +Practical equipment and resources for studies
  • +Qualified and committed teachers
  • +Variety of programs and flexible learning options
  • +Excellent facilities and supportive learning environment
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities.
  • +Well-prepared teachers.
  • +Good teacher training programs.
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Aggressive and persistent enrollment outreach
  • -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support creates a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

A comprehensive review reveals a university that excels in key academic and student experience areas. Professors and student life are particularly strong, receiving high marks at 4.5 and 4.47 respectively. Facilities and location also score well. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, with ratings around 3.6. The overall value of the education is rated moderately at 3.94.

Overall, this institution garners exceptionally high praise, particularly excelling in its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Value for money also stands out as a strong point. Its weakest area, though still strong at 4, is internationality, suggesting room for growth in global engagement compared to its other outstanding attributes.

Academic and value aspects of the university are clearly its strengths, with Professors, Location, and Value all receiving high marks of 4.25 or above. Student life and accommodation are also well-regarded. Conversely, the institution's Internationality is a notable area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 2.25. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.75.

A consistent performance is evident across this university's ratings, with exceptional scores in Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality received moderate ratings, representing the areas with the most room for improvement within the university's offerings.

Based on the provided ratings, the university demonstrates an equal distribution of performance across all evaluated aspects. No specific areas stand out as either particularly strong or weak, as each category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received a neutral rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, experience across the board.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 56% of reviews praise well-prepared professors and ample study resources. A small portion (~8%) mentions issues with aggressive enrollment calls and ineffective communication channels.

All five reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.6/5 stars. Students praise excellent facilities, well-furnished lectures, and helpful staff. The university is recognized for academic and technological challenges, and applying knowledge to real-life projects.

All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a strong educational offer, particularly in engineering, and good support from professors and the postgraduate program. Some mention facilities could be improved, and accessing equipment can be challenging.

With a 4.75/5 average rating from four reviews, this university is overwhelmingly praised. Students highlight excellent teachers, a rich learning environment, and suitable facilities, with some mentioning economic options and diverse activities. No negative feedback was provided.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlighted excellent infrastructure and well-equipped facilities.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
32%
60%
25%
75%
100%
60%
0%
4★
24%
40%
75%
25%
0%
40%
0%
3★
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Acquire the knowledge you need at your pace

The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close